Jump to content

Talk:Washington Bridge (Harlem River)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleWashington Bridge (Harlem River) has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 20, 2021Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on February 27, 2021.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the first vehicle on New York City's Washington Bridge (pictured) crossed it without permission?

Is there really walkways/sidewalks on both sides?

[edit]

I know it being a connector highway to I-95, the sidewalks would be barricaded somewhat from the main highway/connector itself, but I only see walkways on the westbound end of the bridge. RobertFL1991 (talk) 21:06, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 26 May 2024

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Cremastra (talk) 14:38, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


– Since there are multiple bridges with the same name or similar names, this bridge is not the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. To avoid confusion with the George Washington Bridge, the best way to name the bridge is by making it clear that this is a Harlem River crossing. JE98 (talk) 22:15, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
I did not notice this until now. For what it's worth, this move was reasonable and should've occurred years ago. Epicgenius (talk) 17:07, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]