Talk:Walls of Seville

	Spain portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spain, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Spain on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpainWikipedia:WikiProject SpainTemplate:WikiProject SpainSpain articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Fortifications / European / Spanish

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Fortifications task force
	European military history task force
	Spanish military history task force

Translate before editing

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

There are two problems with this article, first it is a poor translation from the Spanish, and two, there are few references. I'd like to fill this article out and work on making it legible and well referenced. However, I have a question for the editors In your experience is it counterproductive to improve the translation of the page prior to conducting the research? I want the article to be legible as soon as possible because this subject is dear to me, but I know that it seems backwards to correct something that might be re-written in the near future by me. Any suggestions?

Youtryandyoutry (talk) 20:00, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It is really up to you to decide which way you would prefer to do it, but I agree that it is desirable for the article to be legible as soon as possible, so I would prefer the "improve the translation first" approach, unless you feel the amount of work needed to do that is too much to be worthwhile. That is, of course, just my opinion, and for the present I will leave your help request open in case anyone else has any opinion to offer. Please remove or close the request if you think you have had enough help, so that editors don't waste time checking a help request that no longer applies. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 22:00, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'd say that's something of a personal preference. I myself would start with the research, but improving the legibility of a poorly-sourced article is still an improvement - if you think doing that first as a stop-gap measure before looking into the references is worth the extra effort it will likely cause, go for it. Huon (talk) 22:03, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]