User talk:Youtryandyoutry

Belated Welcome!

Hello, Youtryandyoutry, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Principality of Novgorod-Seversk has not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and has been or will be removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. Iryna Harpy (talk) 06:22, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted your edit to Picts. Perhaps Catfish Jim was awry with his suggestion of vandalism, but I have no idea what "murno gladst" is and I can't see any obvious sign of this on a quick web search. if you have a decent citation for this by all means provide it. Ben Mac Dui 16:23, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The only reference I can find to "Murno Gladst" is in a deleted article that was moved to user space, then subsequently deleted from there. You're an admin aren't you Ben, you should be able to read this: User:Murno Gladst/autobiography. I can't make head nor tail of it. Catfish Jim and the soapdish 15:35, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Sola Busca Tarot has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Sola Busca Tarot. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 02:01, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sola Busca tarot has been accepted

Sola Busca tarot, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 11:19, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Help me!

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Some advice would be greatly appreciated. I want to fix the outstanding problems with the page I created in 2015, https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Sola_Busca_tarot. I'm not sure how to best add more inline citations without each sentence referencing the same reference at the bottom of the page. Do I need to find different sources to reference, or is it okay to put inline references at the end of every sentence. I essentially only have the two references for this article at this point. Should I search for more?

Youtryandyoutry (talk) 16:38, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may want to take a look at WP:Referencing for beginners#Same reference used more than once. Two sources, however, is very little; finding more couldn't hurt. Huon (talk) 20:33, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

October 2018

Hello, I'm DerbyCountyinNZ. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Stonehenge have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. DerbyCountyinNZ ^{(Talk Contribs)} 22:01, 12 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I notice you've been warned above for pushing murno gladst onto article with apparently no justification. I advise you to take more care with this or you can expect stronger warnings. DerbyCountyinNZ ^{(Talk Contribs)} 22:02, 12 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi DerbyCountyinNZ I will gladly do this, but I would like to respond directly to your message. Essentially, I understand the confusion I briefly caused, and I'd like to explain. I was trying to move a reference from where I had placed it (at the end of the sentence) to exactly where someone had posted a "citation needed" tag (in the middle of the sentence). Unfortunately I copied the wrong ref tag (a footer and not a header tag was moved to the start of the reference) and I didn't preview the changes which I am normally careful to do. It was a bit of a disaster, and I was horrified that I had caused an unsightly error message to appear on the Stonehenge page for a few minutes. I rushed to fix it and only made matters worse until I ended up undoing my two edits and then finally doing what I had intended to do: place the correct reference exactly where someone had requested it. It was this change which has just been reverted due to the chaos I created. A murno gladst fence is an old term for a kind of embankment, but it is also the unique name for this kind of embankment and it appears in numerous publications about henges etc from the 1600s onwards. I've got a special interest in the subject as I do many other obscure subjects. My first edits on wikipedia years ago were also about this subject and I did it incorrectly which resulted in my entry being removed and the message you saw on my talk page. I wanted to clear this up with you personally because I felt I was being perceived to be doing something that I was not. Youtryandyoutry (talk) 22:29, 12 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Murno gladst fence for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Murno gladst fence is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Murno gladst fence until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Qwirkle (talk) 04:13, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

November 2018

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for Deliberately perpetuating hoaxes.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. SpinningSpark 14:39, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This account appears to be a sockpuppet of User:BarbaraMervin. We do not unblock disruptive sock accounts. Any unblock request should be made through the sockmaster account (the oldest account used). SpinningSpark 14:56, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Youtryandyoutry. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]