Talk:WDND (1490 AM)

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Indiana portal This article is supported by WikiProject Indiana (assessed as Low-importance).

Radio Stations Low‑importance

	Radio portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Radio Stations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of radio stations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Radio StationsWikipedia:WikiProject Radio StationsTemplate:WikiProject Radio StationsRadio station articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:KAPY-LP (defunct) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 04:48, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:KCLA (defunct) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 03:32, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 18 April 2019

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. There is a narrow consensus for a move to WDND (1490 AM). (closed by non-admin page mover) qedk (t 桜 c) 07:21, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It was proposed in this section that WDND (1490 AM) be renamed and moved somewhere else, with the name being decided below.

The discussion has been closed, and the result will be found in the closer's comment.

Links: current log • target log

WPNT (Indiana) → ? – There are major problems with this article's title as it currently stands. The station that is the subject of this article, which was licensed to South Bend, Indiana, never broadcast with the call sign WPNT. The call sign was assigned when the station was silent and it never used it on the air. Another defunct station in South Bend, Indiana did actually broadcast with the call sign WPNT. This makes (Indiana) an inappropriate disambiguator. When someone from South Bend would hear the call sign WPNT, they would most likely think of the station that actually broadcast with that call sign, not a station that only held it while it was silent. An active station should always be titled by its current call sign, but this is not an active station, and thus WPNT is not this station's current call sign either.

Proposal 1
- WDND (1490 AM)

This is the last call sign that the station actually used on the air, and is the option I personally prefer. Far more people would know the station as WDND than would know it as WPNT. The last media coverage that the station received calls it WDND. The station does not appear to have received any media coverage after its call sign was changed to WPNT.

Proposal 2
- WPNT (1490 AM)

This uses call sign the station held while it was silent, prior to the license being deleted. It adequately distinguishes it from the defunct AM 1620 in South Bend, which also held the call sign WPNT.

This page was recently moved to this title as the result of a recently closed discussion, so I am pinging the editors who were involved in that discussion to get their input @Stereorock, Neutralhomer, Gonnym, SMcCandlish, Imzadi1979, Bkonrad, Trystan, Amakuru, Born2cycle, MB, Levdr1lp, Raymie, and StraussInTheHouse. Tdl1060 (talk) 05:10, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Support Proposal 1. While I typically like final callsigns, in this case the callsign change occurred while the facility was silent. I believe there is a compelling exception that should be baked into WP:NCBC when it involves callsigns that are swapped or warehoused—or, in the case of the instant 1490 facility, given a Viking funeral. (See Talk:WLQR (AM) if these sorts of issues interest you, as that is a similar case where the callsign was switched one week before surrendering the license.) Thank you for spotting the need for further attention in this particular case. Raymie (t • c) 05:40, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Option 1, obviously. The second proposal fails WP:COMMONNAME and WP:RECOGNIZABLE. See also WP:OFFICIALNAME; WP really doesn't give a damn what the FCC's preference might be in its internal paperwork nearly no one in the world knows about or has read. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 06:36, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Neither, as the station was apparently best-known , & spent the longest time as (1955-1998), WNDU (AM). From what I can tell, there is no current AM station using the WNDU callsign. Stereorock (talk) 08:28, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Either Proposal 1 or WNDU (AM). While we give extra weight to sources after a name change, per WP:NAMECHANGES, once something is fully in the past, using the name it was known by for most of its existence makes sense.--Trystan (talk) 14:24, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Move to WNDU (AM) or WNDU (1490 AM) - When a station changes callsigns, offices, towers, owners, and frequency... it really becomes a Ship of Theseus problem where you start to wonder if you've still got the same topic you started with. This category of article is one of the most difficult to apply WP:CRITERIA, but I'll try. Recognizability suggests we somehow incorporate the long-time 1490AM frequency and "South Bend"/"Indiana" in the title (most casual people don't follow callsigns, but they know the area and frequency). Naturalness suggests that the most often used title would be the one in current use, or since this is defunct, the title used during its peak of popularity - WNDU (AM). Precision is satisfied using a name nothing else does, which WNDU (AM) satisfies as it hasn't been reused. Conciseness suggests we use the shortest identifiable name, so any callsign is fine, with the shortest reasonable disambiguation. Consistency means application of WP:NCBC and that means the current title would be fine except for the other WPNT station in Indiana, so additional or alternate disambiguation is needed. Nothing meets all the CRITERIA, so no matter what this article needs a LOT of redirects created to it, especially to assist with Recognizability. Overall, this is what led to my vote. -- Netoholic @ 23:55, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Stereorock, Trystan, and Netoholic: WNDU (AM) was what I had initially favored as well, and was what I had suggested naming this article in the discussion for the previous move. I had felt the same way, that the article should use the call sign that it had held the longest and was used during the peak of its popularity. However, after researching the station and expanding the article, I began favoring using the final call sign that it broadcast under.

Determining the peak of a station's popularity is not always easy. In my research I found that there just aren't enough sources that discuss this station while it was WNDU for us to conclusively state that this was its peak in popularity. In this station's case, its peak in popularity was either in its early years as WHOT, or as a country station in the 1980s, while it held the call sign WNDU (the station did well in the ratings during this period). Had the station been WNDU from its sign on until 1998, then WNDU would definitely be the obvious choice. Its peak in popularity certainly wasn't during the last three call signs it held. The call sign WNDU definitely does have a strong legacy in South Bend, and far more people today would recognize the station as WNDU than as WHOT, so I'm fine with moving the article to WNDU (AM). However, I do fear opening up a can of worms by basing the titles of defunct stations on peak of popularity when it cannot be strongly backed up by reliable sources.--Tdl1060 (talk) 09:18, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think we can be "wrong" using any of the options, or really fully "right". Since this topic area is so problematic from a naming perspective... maybe we do need to try a few different tactics and see what works. Redirects can mitigate the confusion while we do so. -- Netoholic @ 11:56, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

That's true. In this station's case, none of the call signs it has held would be fully "right" or fully "wrong", and none would be overly problematic. However, in cases that do pose more of a Ship of Theseus problem, the title used does become more important, because with some titles it could be unclear whether the article is about the station's entire history or a specific period. As far as redirects are concerned, hatnotes and entries in disambiguation pages should be sufficient for this station.--Tdl1060 (talk) 23:32, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.