Talk:Volleyball at the 2016 Summer Olympics – Women's qualification

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Volleyball Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Volleyball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Volleyball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VolleyballWikipedia:WikiProject VolleyballTemplate:WikiProject VolleyballVolleyball
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women's sport Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's sport (and women in sports), a WikiProject which aims to improve coverage of women in sports on Wikipedia. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Women's sportWikipedia:WikiProject Women's sportTemplate:WikiProject Women's sportWomen's sport
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Intercontinental qualification

The Intercontinental qualification will be not held in Tokyo, Japan. Because Japan Volleyball Association announced that the world qualification(2) is not decided.[1]--Chiba ryo (talk) 04:54, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I can understand you. I have ever rewrited the OGQT template when I see the official website of OG qualification. After that I see maybe daily dig in FIVB website said both World and intercon will be held in Japan. So, I revert back. And, I saw NORCECA Tournament last Sunday in match PUR MEX the speaker said that the winners of this match would go to Japan. So, I think we should wait for next announcement from FIVB. I have a question "not decide"=" not held" or not. Noncommittalp (talk) 05:27, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I read it one more time. And, I think you are right. Thanks. I have a question. The Asian QT winners will be selected first, follow by top three teams from 7 remaining, right? Noncommittalp (talk) 20:36, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The way Noncommittalp explains it is the way it was also explained in the Dutch media, but they probably read it here anyway. The only thing that confuses me how it's 4 out of 8 teams from real qualifiers and 1 out of 4 from a group of definitely weaker teams. It's almost as if they want at least one "loser" to qualify. - FakirNL (talk) 23:22, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Volleyball at the 2016 Summer Olympics – Women's qualification. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160311141900/http://www.rio2016.com/sites/default/files/users/rio2016_files/fivb-volleyball-en_0.pdf to http://www.rio2016.com/sites/default/files/users/rio2016_files/fivb-volleyball-en_0.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:08, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]