Talk:Voice of the Nation

Iran Low‑importance

	Iran portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Iran, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles related to Iran on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project where you can contribute to the discussions and help with our open tasks.IranWikipedia:WikiProject IranTemplate:WikiProject IranIran articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics: Political parties Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Political parties task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Q!

@Pahlevun: People's Voice (Iran) have members by ideology Reformist, Moderates and Independent not Principlists! (FaraJenahi) what is your idea?--Samək^Talk 22:26, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Samak:. People's Voice is self-proclaimed principlist, as declared on a statement:

طراحان این حرکت ،‌ خود را مفتخر به عضویت در جریان اصولگرایی می دانند و اگرچه اختلافات سلیقه ای با بعضی از افراد و نحله های اصولگرایی دارند اما در اعتقاد قلبی به ضرورت حاکمیت ارزشهای دینی و ولایت فقیه - که مبانی اصلی و مشترک تفکر اصولگرایی را تشکیل می دهند - تردیدی ندارند و عملا بدان ملتزمند. ر ضرورت همدلی اصولگرایان و حضور آنان در قالب فهرستی واحد با محوریت حضرت آیه الله مهدوی کنی اصرار ورزیدیم و از نگاه فراگیر معظم له در تعریف دامنه اصولگرایی و محبت به اینجانبان ممنون بوده و هستیم . اینک که به دلیل انشعاب برخی از اصولگرایان ،‌ ‌امکان حضور مستقل و ظهور فهرست های دیگر به وجود آمده است ما نیز ضمن احترام به همه حاضران این رقابت ، به فعالیت مستقل روی آورده ایم

It also includes moderate principlists, as it had principlists such as Hassan Ghafourifard, Hossein Sheykholeslam, Mohammad Khoshchehreh and Hassan Bayadi on the list in 2016.

I think this article needs to be updated and include explanaitions about its position. Pahlevun (talk) 11:29, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Pahlevun: Ali Motahari was the List of Hope dependent on Moderation and refromist. but he is principlist. How can we identify the party this person? In the next parliament, his opinions is in keeping with government supporters or government critics?--Samək^Talk 16:31, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Samak:. I did not get your point. What is your suggestion? Pahlevun (talk) 16:34, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Pahlevun: I think the approach of this party is unknown. Initially were conservative, then were moderate. finally most members were selected the list of reformists.--Samək^Talk 22:28, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Samak: Gutcha. According to the sources, the group is moderate conservative. It is mentioned in the article that their lists include refomists. If you saw a reliable source stating what you think, I would appriciate it if you add it to the article. Pahlevun (talk) 15:12, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Pahlevun: If i Saw valid sources, add to article. Thanks for your comment. Eydetan Mubarak.--Samək^Talk 16:20, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Samak: Thank you for your contriutions, and Eid Mubarak too! Pahlevun (talk) 17:42, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Pahlevun:what is your opinion? have written political independent and reformist.--Samək^Talk 22:13, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Pahlevun:. Is it an official/verified account? Pahlevun (talk) 12:21, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Pahlevun: Yeah, this account is official.--Samək^Talk 07:14, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Samak:. The account is not verified and does not use the insignia, seems like a fanpage to me. Pahlevun (talk) 09:20, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Pahlevun:Certainly isnot fanpage. In elections majlis board, sooner from all news agencies announced elected members. anyway know this party as conservative is wrong and false. perhaps be divided from the conservatives, but now are opposed to this party, Jenah or Gerayesh. thanks.--Samək^Talk 09:51, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Samak:. It is not a proof for the instagram page to be official. A reliable source is needed to remove the group from principlist tendency. Pahlevun (talk) 10:06, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 16 July 2020

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved as proposed (no objections). (closed by non-admin page mover) Mdaniels5757 (talk) 16:46, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Voice of Nation → Voice of the Nation – although a Google search shows that "Voice of Nation" is used in some English-language sources, "Voice of the Nation" is used in more, e.g. the BBC News citation given in the article. It is a more natural English translation. – Fayenatic London 08:57, 16 July 2020 (UTC) —Relisting. Bingobro (Chat) 05:31, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.