Talk:Vivian Malone Jones

This article is part of WikiProject Alabama, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Alabama on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page to join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlabamaWikipedia:WikiProject AlabamaTemplate:WikiProject AlabamaAlabama articles

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Civil Rights Movement Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Civil Rights Movement, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Civil Rights Movement on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Civil Rights MovementWikipedia:WikiProject Civil Rights MovementTemplate:WikiProject Civil Rights MovementCivil Rights Movement articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

To-do list for Vivian Malone Jones:

No to-do list assigned.

WikiProject Civil Rights Movement to do list:

Edit the tasks list

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : All redlinked articles listed at User:Mitchumch/Movement templates#Civil Rights Movement need to be created.
Durham movement (North Carolina)
Greensboro movement (North Carolina) (currently a redirect)
Henry Hezekiah Dee (currently a redirect)
Delano Herman Middleton (currently a redirect)
Charles Eddie Moore (currently a redirect)
Henry Ezekial Smith (currently a redirect)
Cleanup : Rosa Parks, and upgrade to GA status
Black Arts Movement
Collaborate : Tagging all relevant articles with project template.
Expand : And the Walls Came Tumbling Down
Medgar Evers
The Children (Halberstam)
Cambridge movement (civil rights)
Browder v. Gayle
Strom Thurmond filibuster of the Civil Rights Act of 1957
Photo : Milton Galamison • J. Charles Jones • Gloria Richardson • Richard Durham • Freedom Riders • Freedom Summer • March Against Fear • Prayer Pilgrimage for Freedom • Youth March for Integrated Schools (1958) • Youth March for Integrated Schools (1959) • Birmingham riot of 1963 • 16th Street Baptist Church bombing (image of bombing) • Bloody Tuesday (1964) • Biloxi wade-ins (image of wade-ins) • Tallahassee bus boycott • Tent City (Tennessee) • Memphis sanitation strike (image of actual strike) • Americus movement • Hebrew Benevolent Congregation Temple bombing • Baton Rouge bus boycott • Orangeburg massacre • Mansfield school desegregation incident • Bloody Monday (Danville)

Women's History Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 31 August 2020 and 7 December 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): KaiAbiola. Peer reviewers: Anonymouse3042, Aarukrish.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 12:31, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Student editing

Hi Marthasjones and Ian (Wiki Ed). I need to touch base about the editing procedures students are being given (if I gather, they are taking whole entries and revising in their userspace then pasting back in?) because it reverts any constructive intervening changes to the entry. There is also an attribution issue created when large portions is copied out of and then back into an entry. I noticed the infobox was missing because I’m the one who added it but because I don’t know when the entry was copied out, I don’t know what other changes need to be restored. I’m not pinging the student because if this is the assignment, then it’s not their fault, but it’s also not fair to volunteer editors to be left to clean up problems introduced by work that is compensated, either with course credit or salary. Please, could you have students enter their changes one by one, as most of us do, or simply assign another type of assignment (new entries could be worked up in sandbox without generating this problem)? Thank you. Innisfree987 (talk) 19:05, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Innisfree987. So sorry about any issues I may have caused. I'm unsure as to why the infobox was removed. The only sections I contributed edits to was the Later Life, Personal Life, Death, and Legacy sections. I made sure to copy sentence by sentence from my sandbox, but it seems like it got messed up along the way when I was adding citations to sentences that you had already contributed. So sorry again. Please let me know if there is anything else you noticed that may have been slightly altered by the contributions that I made. Thank you for bringing this to my attention. KaiAbiola (talk) 19:22, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

KaiAbiola, thank you for your quick reply! As I say above, if this method of editing was part of your course assignment, it definitely isn’t your fault. It will almost necessarily introduce errors because a wiki is dynamic and can change between when you copied out text and when you pasted back in. Going forward—I hope you stick around and share more of your valuable knowledge!—I would advise only using your sandbox to work up brand-new work (either new entries or totally new passages) and if you’re making edits to existing texts, do that directly in the entry.
This also helps adhere to the attribution requires of our Creative Commons license, so you don’t accidentally make the edit history look like you wrote something someone else actually did (don’t worry, I know you def don’t want to do that, I’m sure you just weren’t alerted to that issue). Hope that’s clarifying—let me know if I can answer any questions for you! Innisfree987 (talk) 19:53, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Innisfree987: thanks for the ping. We've tried it both ways, and getting students to draft their contributions in their sandbox is usually the least disruptive. That said, we encourage them to just copy pieces of the article they want to edit, rather than the whole thing, and always re-add things in smaller pieces (to avoid deleting infoboxes, templates and categories). But any general strategy ends up, unfortunately, with specific problems. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 21:03, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]