Talk:Visa policy of Azerbaijan/GA1

GA Review

Passed. -ASHEIOU (THEY/THEM • TALK) 16:43, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sunriseshore (talk · contribs) 01:11, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a. (prose, spelling, and grammar):

The writing is to the point and concisse in most cases

b. (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a. (reference section):

As far as I can see most of the information is cited though sometimes travel websites and magazines were used as source material (as opposed to government websites) However the information is verifibly correct

b. (citations to reliable sources):

c. (OR):

This article describes the Visa policies of the country, I don't see any intentional ideological bias here

d. (copyvio and plagiarism):
It is broad in its coverage.
a. (major aspects):

b. (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):

b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):

This is one of the article's sstrong point
Overall:
Pass/fail:

Here is an article that is netural, comprehensive and is well illustrated. Anyone who is not familar with the topic will have a well flushed breakdown on Azerbarjini visa policies after reading the article.

(Criteria marked are unassessed)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.