Talk:Visa policy of Azerbaijan

Visa policy of Azerbaijan has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: May 15, 2023. (Reviewed version).

A fact from Visa policy of Azerbaijan appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 4 June 2023 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that in 2017 the British travel magazine Wanderlust rated Azerbaijan's electronic visa as the easiest visa to obtain in the world?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2023/June. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Visa policy of Azerbaijan.

Wikipedia

Azerbaijan High‑importance

	Azerbaijan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Azerbaijan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Azerbaijan-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AzerbaijanWikipedia:WikiProject AzerbaijanTemplate:WikiProject AzerbaijanAzerbaijan articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Spoken Wikipedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spoken Wikipedia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles that are spoken on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Spoken WikipediaWikipedia:WikiProject Spoken WikipediaTemplate:WikiProject Spoken WikipediaSpoken Wikipedia articles

Archives

Archive 1

Republic of Artsakh / Nagorno-Karabakh

Hello, I've noticed an edit removing the mention of Nagorno-Karabakh from the entry restrictions. No matter what your political view, the government of Azerbaijan does not restrict access to any place called the Republic of Artsakh, only what they call Nagorno-Karabakh. I'm going to re-add a mention of Nagorno-Karabakh, as to ensure a neutral point of view. If anyone has an issue with this, please discuss! Kind regards, ~ Asheiou (talk) 21:09, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

Passed. -ASHEIOU (THEY/THEM • TALK) 16:43, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Visa policy of Azerbaijan/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Sunriseshore (talk · contribs) 01:11, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a. (prose, spelling, and grammar):

The writing is to the point and concisse in most cases

b. (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a. (reference section):

As far as I can see most of the information is cited though sometimes travel websites and magazines were used as source material (as opposed to government websites) However the information is verifibly correct

b. (citations to reliable sources):

c. (OR):

This article describes the Visa policies of the country, I don't see any intentional ideological bias here

d. (copyvio and plagiarism):
It is broad in its coverage.
a. (major aspects):

b. (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):

b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):

This is one of the article's sstrong point
Overall:
Pass/fail:

Here is an article that is netural, comprehensive and is well illustrated. Anyone who is not familar with the topic will have a well flushed breakdown on Azerbarjini visa policies after reading the article.

(Criteria marked are unassessed)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Bruxton (talk) 22:32, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that in 2017, British travel magazine Wanderlust rated Azerbaijan's electronic visa as the easiest visa to obtain in the world? Source: https://www.wanderlust.co.uk/content/easiest-visas-worldwide/
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Leonard Potts

Improved to Good Article status by Asheiou (talk). Nominated by BorgQueen (talk) at 17:43, 15 May 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Visa policy of Azerbaijan; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: Technically some MOS:RELTIME that should have been picked up as part of the GA review ("All air travellers can apply for a visa on arrival between 1 April and 15 May 2023" for example) but nothing that breaks DYK rules. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 12:51, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hiya AirshipJungleman29, I fixed the tensing on that "can apply for a visa on arrival". It was correct at time of the GA review and I forgot to change it now the time has passed. You mentioned "for example". Are there any other issues you can spot? Feel free to WP:FIXIT or let me know so I can fix it! Thanks for bringing this to my attention. -Asheiou (they/them • talk) 21:42, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]