Talk:Vis (island)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Vis (island) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Croatia Mid‑importance

	Croatia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Croatia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Croatia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CroatiaWikipedia:WikiProject CroatiaTemplate:WikiProject CroatiaCroatia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Greece Low‑importance

	Greece portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greece on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreek articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Islands

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of islands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslandsWikipedia:WikiProject IslandsTemplate:WikiProject IslandsIslands articles

Liburnians

The Liburnian people were not Illyrians. 82.35.40.241 00:52, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The island of Vis was in control of the Narentines (Serbs?); it was not taken by Tomislav (Medieval Croatia rarely had any maritime possession). --PaxEquilibrium 18:41, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Coordinates

The article doesn't tells the coordinates of thi sisland.It is 43°4'52N and 16°7'14E.See this site: [[1]] to see the coordinates.Agre22 (talk) 22:53, 14 September 2008 (UTC)agre22[reply]

Not quite. Your co-ordinates are in the sea, I'm afraid. Ostrvo, pretty close to the centre of the island is at 43° 2' 42N, 16° 9' 6E. See [2]. This site agrees too [3]. Best, AlasdairGreen27 (talk) 14:13, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Silly move

LoL... another sock of those banned Italian nationalist guys moved the article. Its well known the Google test heavily favors "Vis" (104,000,000 hits [4]) over "Lissa" (2,540,000 hits [5]). Could an admin fix this and ban the sock by the quick procedure? --DIREKTOR ^(TALK) 09:59, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I left a note here, but it seems I may have been wrong in AGF'ing this move. Regards, Finn Rindahl (talk) 10:18, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Its like the 30th sock of the same clique of Italian nationalists that got banned years ago. They keep resurfacing now and then trying to "italianize" whatever toponym they can link to Italy in any way. Continued vandalism over a very lomng period. Block evasion and personal attacks. Ban on sight. --DIREKTOR ^(TALK) 12:24, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

How about move protection (if this continues)? --DIREKTOR ^(TALK) 16:33, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Move protection seem like a good idea, but I'm not sure where to request that. For a ban I believe you would have to request a CU - hardly worth while in my opinion. If the user tries to move the page without discussion again that would in itself be a blocking reason I should think (I'm not an admin around here though). Finn Rindahl (talk) 16:53, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Depopulation after WWI?

The claim the population of the Vis was nearly entirely relocated to Italian Dalmatia following world war one seems improbable. In my own knowledge of the island's history, I've heard of nothing of the sort. The Italian version of the article says that in the 1900 census, less than 5% of the island spoke Italian, further adding implausibility to the claim. The claim either needs a reputable citation or should be removed. 129.72.153.18 (talk) 18:32, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

As the original poster has not added a citation, I am removing the claim (129.72.153.18 (talk) 20:49, 6 September 2011 (UTC))[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Vis (island). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070607172543/http://www.tz-vis.hr/eng/economy.htm to http://www.tz-vis.hr/eng/economy.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:03, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]