Talk:Violence against women in the Philippines

	Philippines portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tambayan Philippines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to the Philippines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Tambayan PhilippinesWikipedia:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesTemplate:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesPhilippine-related
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Feminism Mid‑importance

	Feminism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Feminism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Feminism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FeminismWikipedia:WikiProject FeminismTemplate:WikiProject FeminismFeminism
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women's History Mid‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Mistake

I've made a mistake, it should read, Violence Against Women in the Philippines. Anyone know how to fix this? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Susanbryce (talk • contribs) 06:20, May 2, 2010‎

Looks like Qwerty Binary moved the page to the appropriate capitalisation. Gobōnobō ⁺ ^c 19:36, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of dramatization picture

This picture is not reflective of the overall article. I would like to find an alternative if possible, as you can't even determine the genders of either individual in the image.
-TheCaliforniaKansan (talk) 18:25, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Violence against women in the Philippines. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

Attempted to fix sourcing for http://archives.cnn.com/2000/ASIANOW/south/11/11/bangladesh.acid.ap/index.html
Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.cbc.ca/thelens/heaven_facts.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 14:15, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Violence against women in the Philippines. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.webcitation.org/5OzhDYYFa
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160116103319/http://ecpatinternational.com/EI/Resource_newsclippings.asp?id=928 to http://ecpatinternational.com/EI/Resource_newsclippings.asp?id=928

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:42, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Violence against Filipino women is unnecessary

Every country, ethnic group, caste, religious group had experienced sexual violence by insiders, outsiders, foreign conquerors, colonizers. Just like for Germany/Iraqi/China/India/Pakistan alone you could write a long page of thousand years sexual violence suffering and you can do the same with every ethnic group in the world. If you can write a historical page about " Violence against women in the Philippines " than I see no reason why anyone or even trolls can't do the same against any other ethnicity in the world, that's why there shouldn't be such a long history for just one ethnic group.

Note: User talk:121.214.36.82 is not moderator and uses a proxy address nor hold any rank in wikipedia but has giving me fake warning messages 2 times by intimidating to be a moderator. He send warnings so that he can scare people into not challenging his authority. The link is here ---> https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:77.100.234.159&diff=828544856&oldid=828544012 he takes advantage of the fact that other moderators have given me warning a long time ago ( half year ) , my last edit had been since half year ago and this user uses a proxy address

- (77.100.234.159 (talk) 08:56, 3 March 2018 (UTC)) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.100.234.159 (talk) [reply]

Doesn't stop me from asking for a page to be protected. I have been editing Wikipedia for more than four years and this is not the first page that I have successfully asked to be protected. Move on. (121.220.54.135 (talk) 23:44, 3 March 2018 (UTC))[reply]

How I am suppose to this discuss if you're ignoring the the topic. Obviously you had asked for this page to be protected but you ignore discussing the core of the problem. (77.100.234.159 (talk) 17:59, 3 March 2018 (UTC))[reply]

@77.100.234.159: What am I ignoring? You're trying to make POV edits, why should I take you seriously? Not to mention the despicable remarks you made against me, claiming I was a sockpuppet. Just look at yourself, you were evading a block using multiple accounts and IP addresses! How dare you have the audacity to claim I was a sockpuppet, my IP address changes because I don't have a static IP, I can't help that. I have no reason to engage in discussion with a POV-pushing editor. End of discussion! (137.147.22.168 (talk) 00:52, 9 March 2018 (UTC))[reply]

Socioeconomic abuse

Hello everyone,

I would like to add a new section titled socioeconomic abuse. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Queenbook2021 (talk • contribs) 22:14, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]