Talk:Vale of Glamorgan Line
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The route diagram template for this article can be found in Template:Vale of Glamorgan Line map. |
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Vale of Glamorgan Line. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071020215002/http://www.railfuture.org.uk/tiki-download_file.php?fileId=39 to http://www.railfuture.org.uk/tiki-download_file.php?fileId=39
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:02, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Class 231?
[edit]Is there a source for class 231s being used on this line? The class 231 page doesn't mention this line at all, and I've personally never seen them on the line. Suntooooth (talk) 16:03, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
- I've just reverted the edit which added it per this comment.
- When I have time in the never-going-to-happen future, I'd love to crackdown on this sort of "these trains run on this line [citation needed]"...! Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 17:57, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks! That's probably something for me to look into sometime too when I don't have any specific typo-fixing duties to do :P Suntooooth (talk) 20:23, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
- They definitely operated on the Penarth branch of the line, for a while (pretty much since introduction). They then from June this year switched to operating to Barry. So they're definitely have been and are being used on this line. Cfsw15 (talk) 13:51, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, but this is now over a year later from my original comment, and I've also seen them on the line by now :P Still not sure if there's an actual reliable source for it, not original research. Suntooooth, it/he (talk/contribs) 13:55, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
- https://news.tfw.wales/blog/cyflwyno-ein-trenau-newydd-cwestiynau-cyffredin#:~:text=Why%20are%20you%20removing%20the%20new%20class%20231%20trains%20from%20the%20Penarth%20Line%3F%C2%A0
- Here's a tfw news article that mentions they were going to Penarth from 2023 (the branch is part of the vale of Glamorgan line by how the wiki page is setup). It also says they're now going to Barry as if June 2024, idk if this is acceptable source for Wikipedia though? Cfsw15 (talk) 12:49, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, but this is now over a year later from my original comment, and I've also seen them on the line by now :P Still not sure if there's an actual reliable source for it, not original research. Suntooooth, it/he (talk/contribs) 13:55, 15 November 2024 (UTC)