Talk:Unity of Fields

Warning: active arbitration remedies

The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:

You must be logged-in and extended-confirmed to edit or discuss this topic on any page (except for making edit requests, provided they are not disruptive)
You may not make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on any edits related to this topic

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

Further information

The exceptions to the extended confirmed restriction are:

Non-extended-confirmed editors may use the "Talk:" namespace only to make edit requests related to articles within the topic area, provided they are not disruptive.
Non-extended-confirmed editors may not create new articles, but administrators may exercise discretion when deciding how to enforce this remedy on article creations. Deletion of new articles created by non-extended-confirmed editors is permitted but not required.

With respect to the WP:1RR restriction:

Clear vandalism of whatever origin may be reverted without restriction. Also, reverts made solely to enforce the extended confirmed restriction are not considered edit warring.
Editors who violate this restriction may be blocked by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offence.

After being warned, contentious topics procedure can be used against any editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process. Contentious topic sanctions can include blocks, topic-bans, or other restrictions.
Editors may report violations of these restrictions to the Arbitration enforcement noticeboard.

If you are unsure if your edit is appropriate, discuss it here on this talk page first. When in doubt, don't revert!

Articles for creation

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 22 November 2023 by reviewer Aviram7 (talk · contribs).

Palestine Low‑importance

	Palestine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palestine, a team effort dedicated to building and maintaining comprehensive, informative and balanced articles related to the geographic Palestine region, the Palestinian people and the State of Palestine on Wikipedia. Join us by visiting the project page, where you can add your name to the list of members where you can contribute to the discussions.PalestineWikipedia:WikiProject PalestineTemplate:WikiProject PalestinePalestine-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Anarchism

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anarchism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of anarchism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnarchismWikipedia:WikiProject AnarchismTemplate:WikiProject Anarchismanarchism articles

Anarchism WikiProject open tasks
watch · edit · history · talk · purge

Recognized content · Drafts & requests · Subscribe · Member list · Resources · How can I help?

Did you know

19 Nov 2024 – Anarchism without adjectives (talk · edit · hist) was nominated for DYK by Grnrchst (t · c); see discussion
15 Nov 2024 – Fagoppositionens Sammenslutning (talk · edit · hist) was nominated for DYK by Grnrchst (t · c); see discussion
05 Nov 2024 – 1931 Barcelona rent strike (talk · edit · hist) was nominated for DYK by Launchballer (t · c); see discussion
25 Oct 2024 – Voltairine de Cleyre (talk · edit · hist) was nominated for DYK by Grnrchst (t · c); see discussion

Good article nominees

22 Nov 2024 – Los Justicieros (talk · edit · hist) was GA nominated by Grnrchst (t · c); start discussion

Peer reviews

26 Oct 2024 – Lucy Parsons (talk · edit · hist) has been put up for PR by Mujinga (t · c); see discussion

Cleanup (0) · Potentially related articles · Recent edits · Recent Commons images · Stub expansion project (514)

Israel-Hamas War” vs. “Gaza genocide”

Re [1]. The former is less controversial/disputed and more in line with general Wikipedia practice. However I don’t need to start an edit war, so…ip, could you explain your reasons for making this change? Prezbo (talk) 22:00, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I would assume it is due to the the groups stated reasoning for protest would it not make more since to include both the genocide as their reason and the genocide being a consequence of the war. 208.70.31.232 (talk) 22:53, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Whether Israel’s actions constitute genocide is a matter of dispute, so it’s not appropriate to state in “Wikivoice” (as we call it) that a genocide is going on in Gaza…it would be ok to state that Unity of Fields considers it genocide, if that’s information that reliable sources have reported… Prezbo (talk) 15:54, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WP:ARBECR means IPs should not be editing the article or participating in consensus forming discussions. Sean.hoyland (talk) 16:34, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Twitter account not currently banned

the twitter account of Unity does't seem to currently be banned but i am unable to confirm that this is the organizations original account talked about in the article. 208.70.31.232 (talk) 23:14, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It links to the website and visa-versa so i guess it's safe to say. SP00KYtalk 16:51, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Name change & Political pivot

Does anyone have any references to why exactly Unity of Fields changed/split from Palestine Action and became a (seemingly based on their website) an ideologically anarchist orientated project? The article mentions the name change but i think the why would be useful to the article. SP00KYtalk 16:49, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don’t know what Wikipedia’s sourcing conventions are here. Without doing a deep dive, my guess is that we won’t find much info on the groups internal deliberations in the mainstream press, but there are undoubtedly interviews, communiques, maybe articles in radical publications, etc. Prezbo (talk) 19:03, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I intend to go through the insurecto blogs and maybe Telegram if i can bring myself to install it. I think you're right in that I'm also to not-confident i'll find any suitable secondary sources on it though.

Don't think i'll put to much time into this generally, as interesting as it is, as (Conjecture, if educated and experience based) likely it will be that in the long run the group will produce little in terms of notable actions and thus create relevant media for us to write on, with this pivot/split I do not expect them to do much in the vain of Palestine Action and it to probably stall and remain as not much more than an arguably unnotable news aggregation blog. I mean there is a reason Palestine Action, despite containing anarchists within it, portrays itself explicitly as a very 'legit' Non-Violent Direct Action org, does not take an ideological position outside of what directly related to the campaign.

By know means do i mean to dissuade anyone, it is, to me, simply the most likely outcome and simply something to bare in mind. SP00KYtalk 20:51, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]