Talk:Ultima Underworld II: Labyrinth of Worlds/GA1

GA Review

Reviewer: I'll now give the article a spotcheck; the review will follow shortly after. Electroguv (talk · contribs) 13:47, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written. a (prose): b (MoS):

The prose is fine, yet placing "and" after semicolons seems odd to me. The hyphens in the third sentence of the lead will need to be replaced by em dashes.

Semicolon-and formations are grammatically correct, but they're a bit formal and uncommon on Wikipedia. I don't think they count as a prose issue, though. Changed the hypens to emdashes. JimmyBlackwing (talk) 18:47, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

a (references):

b (citations to reliable sources):

c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

a (major aspects):

b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):

b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

Overall:

Pass/Fail:

I am putting the review on hold until the above issues are adressed. Electroguv (talk) 15:22, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Long time no see, Electroguv. Thanks for the review. I'll get a new picture in there as soon as possible. JimmyBlackwing (talk) 18:47, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Welcome back, Jimmy. You've done a great job with this article, as you always do. Hope it'll become an FA someday. Electroguv (talk) 19:16, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  - Thanks. And it might—haven't decided yet. Anyway, I got a new screenshot in there. See what you think. JimmyBlackwing (talk) 21:50, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]