Talk:Typhoon Sarah (1959)

Typhoon Sarah (1959) has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: April 27, 2015. (Reviewed version).

Weather: Tropical / Western Pacific Mid‑importance

	Weather portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details. Articles Requested Project Resources Become a Member Project Talk Assessment A-Class Alerts WeatherWikipedia:WikiProject WeatherTemplate:WikiProject WeatherWeather articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Tropical cyclones portal This article is supported by WikiProject Tropical cyclones (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by the Pacific typhoon work group (assessed as Mid-importance).

Japan: Ryukyu Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 19:48, November 16, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the Ryukyu task force.

WikiProject Japan to do list:

Peer review: None
A-class review: None

Featured content candidates –

Articles: None
Pictures: None
Lists: None

Good article nominations: Vinland Saga (TV series), Godzilla Minus One
Add requested images to articles that need them.
Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions.
Improve and expand Japan-related stubs.
Create some requested articles.
Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English.
Assess unassessed articles

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Typhoon Sarah (1959)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Wilhelmina Will (talk · contribs) 22:43, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

GA criteria

Well-written:

With a few minor grammatical tweaks, the article complies with MOS policies on grammar, layout and prose. "Carry me down, carry me down; carry me down into the wiki!" (talk) 01:00, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

(a) the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct

(b) it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation

Verifiable with no original research:

The article has a decently-sized bibliography of reliable publications. It makes frequent use of them, and does not appear to incorporate any original research. "Carry me down, carry me down; carry me down into the wiki!" (talk) 00:59, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

(a) it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline

(b) reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose)

(c) it contains no original research

Broad in its coverage:

The article seems thorough in its coverage of all encyclopedically relevant aspects to its topic. "Carry me down, carry me down; carry me down into the wiki!" (talk) 00:57, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

(a) it addresses the main aspects of the topic

(b) it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style)

Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.

The article's text takes a fair, neutrally-toned approach to its subject. "Carry me down, carry me down; carry me down into the wiki!" (talk) 00:57, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.

The article's history shows that since its relatively recent creation, it has not suffered any disruptive editing. "Carry me down, carry me down; carry me down into the wiki!" (talk) 00:38, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:

The sole image used in the article at present is public domain - thereby no fair use issues may arise - and serves an informative use. "Carry me down, carry me down; carry me down into the wiki!" (talk) 00:39, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

(a) media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content

(b) media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions

After reading through this article and comparing it to the GA criteria, I am content that the criteria is met. Congratulations! "Carry me down, carry me down; carry me down into the wiki!" (talk) 01:01, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]