Talk:Typhoon Emma (1959)
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Typhoon Emma (1959) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1Auto-archiving period: 3 months |
Typhoon Emma (1959) is a former featured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination was archived. For older candidates, please check the archive. | ||||
Typhoon Emma (1959) has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||
|
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
Info
[edit]- JMA BT
- ATCR
- JTWC BT
- IBTrACS
- Spokane Chronicle 11/12
- Cincinnati Enquirer 11/14
- S&S 11/14 P28
- S&S 11/14 P32
- S&S 11/15 P1
- S&S 11/15 P23
- S&S 11/15 P24
- S&S 11/15 P28
- S&S 11/20
- S&S 1/16/60
- S&S 2/21/60
- Courier-Journal 11/26
- PH Gazette
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Typhoon Emma (1959)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk · contribs) 23:15, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Review
[edit]Lead
[edit]- "Emma steadily weakened and became extratropical on November 13, the JMA ceased tracking the storm on November 15" seems awkwardly written. Maybe add "and the JMA ceased...." or "As Emma steadily weakened...."
- Added the "and".
- Can "tropical depression" be Wikilinked?
- Done.
JMA
[edit]- This could be because I am unfamiliar with Typhoons but this reference and this reference doesn't make sense to me. How can I read it to check for information?
- Added two more notes.
Done with fixes, @HickoryOughtShirt?4:. Thanks for the review. Nova Crystallis (Talk) 01:36, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
- Alrighty, congratulations. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 01:40, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia good articles
- Natural sciences good articles
- Old requests for peer review
- Wikipedia Did you know articles
- GA-Class Weather articles
- Low-importance Weather articles
- GA-Class Tropical cyclone articles
- Low-importance Tropical cyclone articles
- WikiProject Tropical cyclones articles
- GA-Class Pacific typhoon articles
- Low-importance Pacific typhoon articles
- WikiProject Weather articles