Jump to content

Talk:Typhoon Dolphin (2015)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Delete article? Or keep this article?

[edit]

Hi. Just like the topic: Talk:2013 Pacific typhoon season#Storm articles and what to do with them, do we really need this article? So we got two choices here, we wither delete this article since there's nothing really interesting about this storm, or we just keep it. If we are going to keep it, we need to copy the format of Typhoon Francisco (2013). Typhoon2013 (talk) 04:05, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to search tomorrow for some additional information impacts throughout the Mariana Islands. Most likely, however, I will end up merging this article into the storm season page. TropicalAnalystwx13 (talk) 04:23, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
If this article can be expanded (without bloating) by a couple of kb's, then, it should stay IMO. YE Pacific Hurricane 13:02, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Typhoon Dolphin (2015)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Yellow Evan (talk · contribs) 00:12, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


  • " It had a poorly-defined circulation and broad rainbands, while low to moderate wind shear and warm sea surface temperatures favored development.[2]" link to atmospheric circulation due to its first mention here. YE Pacific Hurricane 00:12, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • "Passing just north of Guam, Dolphin produced the first typhoon-force winds since 2002 during Typhoon Pongsona.[1]" in Guam, right? You mention about Rota which is also north of Guam being the first typhoon winds since 2004? YE Pacific Hurricane 00:12, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reviewing! ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 16:04, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Typhoon Dolphin (2015). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 21:08, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]