Talk:Two-child policy

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Joaquinjiron. Peer reviewers: Yvettetiff, Kuehnemankr.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 11:51, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Vietnam

The section on Vietnam sounds as if there was a two-child policy in the 1960s, which was then abandoned and re-introduced in the 1990s. This is not supported by any of the given sources. The only source mentioning the 1960s explicitly states that the policy was in place until 2003, not even mentioning the 1990s. --Roentgenium111 (talk) 16:13, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

Two-Child Policy in Vietnam

I am currently in a class at Rice University on Human Development and am looking to reorganize and expand the article on the two-child policy in Vietnam, modeling the structure of the article to reflect the Wikipedia article for China's One-child policy. Thus, I propose to organize the expansion of the section on Vietnam of the Two-child policy to be:

• 1 Overview
  • History
  • Administration
  • Current status
• 2 Effects
  • Reduction of the birthrate
  • Sex-based birth rate disparity
  • Twins sought
  • Potential social problems
  • Birth tourism
• 3 Criticism
  • Overstatement of the effect of the policy on birth reduction
  • Unequal enforcement
  • Accusations of human rights violations
  • Alleged effect on infanticide rates
• 4 Relaxation of policy

However, I have just started conducting research on this topic, and would greatly appreciate any feedback! If you have any sources, that would be greatly appreciated. Furthermore, Roentgenium111, if you are still interested in this topic, do you have any suggestions on additional sub-headings and ways of organizing this information?

Appleangel11 (talk) 05:02, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

Great work on the Vietnam section!

This looks great, Appleangel11! Everything seems well-sourced and overall the article is very comprehensive. There are a few sentences that could be edited for clarity, and some spaces issues throughout the article, but these are small edits. The one thing that I think could improve the NPOV of the article is if you included a section on the pro-argument for the population policy (that might be advocated for by people other than the government). It’s touched upon through government quotes throughout the article, but it would be nice to have a section parallel to the criticisms section.

Excellent work! Saw329 (talk) 15:51, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

Human Rights Aspect

Good article. One major omission is a discussion of the legal framework for family size and timing in most western countries. Arguably the most important (and the largest legal hurdle a two child policy any "Western" country would face if it wanted to introduce such a policy) is international Human Rights law in the form of the not very well publicise Declaration on Population, signed by 12 Heads of State on the 10th December 1966 which stated 'The majority of parents desire to have the knowledge and the means a plan their families; that the opportunities to decide the number and spacing of children is a basic human right.' The source of this is the UN website itself. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7F:C409:DA00:2D22:F652:AD16:3100 (talk) 11:54, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

United Kingdom

As the entry for the United Kingdom only contained the (albeit) accurate report of political discussions surrounding the introduction of a two child policy as regards welfare benefits, I updated this section to reflect the recent introduction of this policy and the widespread criticism this has caused. It may be worth adding the fact that the UK does not have a high birth rate to the original section (which only quotes the claims that were made at the time this policy first started to be discussed in the UK). But as I am not sure whether this is appropriate for the purpose of this article, I have left the original section untouched. Small candles (talk) 18:24, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Two-child policy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090813091603/http://www.ippf.org/en/About/History.htm to http://www.ippf.org/en/About/History.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:58, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

2018 Updates on said policy changes

Hello, I am a practicing student editor from the WikiProjects class software. I noticed that most of the info from the article has not been updated since around 2015/2016. I am looking at maybe adding additional info that has been more recent as of 2018. Although I need to sort through sources, I am seeing results of how the two child policy is negatively affecting china. There are also studies of how the new 2 child policy is negatively affecting gender roles in China. The links i need to see how reliable the resources are and of course, proper citations are needed. If there are any suggestions I would greatly appreciate it. Thank you.

Potential Source Links: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/21620555.2018.1428895 https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/02/180223131904.htm https://www.economist.com/news/china/21736574-two-child-rule-still-applies-officials-know-more-babies-are-needed-not-fewer-china Joaquinjiron (talk) 02:37, 14 March 2018 (UTC)

Wiki Education assignment: Research Process and Methodology - FA22 - Sect 201 - Thu

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 21 September 2022 and 8 December 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Riven3388 (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Riven3388 (talk) 13:52, 21 November 2022 (UTC)