Talk:Tulpehocken station
Appearance
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | It is requested that an image or photograph of Tulpehocken station be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible. The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
photo(s) and separation
[edit]I added the photo of the station under reconstruction. It obviously has its limits, but it illustrates the discussion about the shape of the building pretty well. Once the repairs are finished, the photo should be replaced. Also, I think I'd separate the station from the Historic District, since the HD is much more impressive than the Station (which is a contributing structure, but still ...). Feedback appreciated. Smallbones (talk) 14:37, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
- A separate article on the Historic District would be a good idea, but since the station is a contributing property the NRHP parameters should be kept there once the HD article is written. ----DanTD (talk) 16:28, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
Build date
[edit]1878 is implausible at best; the Chestnut Hill West Branch wasn't built until 1883-1884. Mackensen (talk) 02:34, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
Categories:
- Start-Class Pennsylvania articles
- Low-importance Pennsylvania articles
- Start-Class rail transport articles
- Low-importance rail transport articles
- Start-Class Stations articles
- WikiProject Stations articles
- All WikiProject Trains pages
- Start-Class Philadelphia articles
- Low-importance Philadelphia articles
- Start-Class National Register of Historic Places articles
- Related-importance National Register of Historic Places articles
- Start-Class National Register of Historic Places articles of Related-importance
- Wikipedia requested images of SEPTA stations