Talk:Truck Festival

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Truck Festival article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Festivals Low‑importance

	Holidays portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Festivals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Festivals on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FestivalsWikipedia:WikiProject FestivalsTemplate:WikiProject FestivalsFestivals articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Rock music Low‑importance

	Rock music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rock music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rock music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Rock musicWikipedia:WikiProject Rock musicTemplate:WikiProject Rock musicRock music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is written as an uncited blog. As is, it is unencyclopedic. Davodd 03:02, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. Added Unreferenced template. The only external link is 404. I propose the article is stripped to the most basic facts until verifiable sources are found. ricmitch 11:07, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you think there are problems with the article, by all means tag it and discuss specifics on the talk page, but don't just go and wipe 90% of the article unless you think it's unsalvageable or untrue. — sjorford ++ 13:27, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Rumours

If possible, please cite them - especially if they're implausible! Newartriot 04:33, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:TruckLogo.png

Image:TruckLogo.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 11:22, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

i don't believe THE BEATLES are really headlining truck this year, especially as the line up hasn't been announced yet. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.136.77.220 (talk) 16:52, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge proposal: Truck Records to here

Truck Records has been tagged for notability for 7 years, unresolved. I couldn't establish that it meets WP:ORG or WP:GNG, but would be a useful merge and redirect. Pinging those who have been involved in creating article/commenting on its notability before: Sjorford, Duffbeerforme, 84.248.81.201. Boleyn (talk) 07:35, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No objection in over 3 months; merged. Boleyn (talk) 17:08, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Boypee BKP Boy pee BKP (talk) 23:23, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]