Talk:Tropical cyclone rainfall forecasting/GA1

GA Review

• Per a comment on the talk page, I'm resending this through the GAC process. I'd forgotten it hadn't passed previously, and improvements were made. Thegreatdr (talk) 04:25, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
• To whomever reviews this article, I'll be away from wikipedia between August 15 and 25. This departure was not known when I submitted the article for GA four score and seven years ago. If you do not think it meets GA criteria, please place it on hold until after August 25. Thank you for your consideration. Thegreatdr (talk) 17:31, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

   Prose is still a little dense and could be a bit more layman-friendly

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   The prose challenges will be a problem pursuing FA. I would work on those extensively before attempting FA. Jclemens (talk) 22:32, 15 August 2008 (UTC)