Jump to content

Talk:Tropical Storm Barry (2001)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Featured articleTropical Storm Barry (2001) is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on December 3, 2011.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 26, 2008Good article nomineeListed
July 31, 2008Peer reviewReviewed
August 23, 2008Featured article candidatePromoted
Current status: Featured article

Todo

[edit]

The Preparations section is wrong. At no point was a hurricane watch issued. There was a TS watch for LA, upped to a warning and extended east. Then a hurricane warning issued over the top of that before the warnings began to be reduced just before landfall.--Nilfanion (talk)

It's accurate now.--Nilfanion (talk) 17:07, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Then why is there no grade on this article?Storm05 17:18, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Cause I don't trust myself to grade articles...--Nilfanion (talk) 18:06, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, I marked it as start the class. As usual, the information is there, but there are quite a few grammar or spelling errors. Some places go into too much detail (watches and warnings), while other places don't have enough detail (non-Florida impact and intro). With some minor to moderate work, it'll be B class. You did a decent job on this. If there was a class between Start and B, this would get that. Hurricanehink (talk) 18:41, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I added more infomation. Storm05 15:55, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Good. For anything higher than a B (like nominating for GA), I would recommend doing a copyedit, add more spacing, more intro, etc. Hurricanehink (talk) 16:25, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I added more infomation. Storm05 13:24, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Tropical Storm Barry (2001)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review. GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

This article is in decent shape, but it needs more work before it becomes a Good Article.

  1. Is it well written?
    A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
    Well done.
    B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
    In the Storm history section, it would be best if "August 3", "August 5", "August 6" were linked once.
  2. Is it verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check?
    A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
    B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):
    Does Reference 1 cover all this ---> "On July 24, 2001, a tropical wave emerged off the west coast of Africa, and tracked westward across the Atlantic Ocean. Little development occurred until July 28, when convective activity began to increase. The wave moved into the eastern Caribbean on July 29, and while tracking west-northwest convection continued to increase over the next few days. The disturbance emerged into the Gulf of Mexico on August 1, with associated rainfall over southern Florida and the western tip of Cuba. A broad low pressure system with a minimum central pressure of 1014 developed along the wave near Dry Tortugas, Florida that same day, and beg an to intensify as it moved northwestward. At around 1800 UTC on August 2, an Air Force Reserve Hurricane Hunter aircraft investigated the system and discovered that the low had organized into Tropical Storm Barry. The low developed into a tropical depression six hours earlier, as revealed by post-season analysis"?
    C. It contains no original research:
    D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
    B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
  4. Is it neutral?
    It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
  5. Is it stable?
    It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
  6. Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
    A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
    B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:
    If the above statements can be answered, I will pass the article. Good luck with improving this article!

--  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 21:48, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I delinked those dates. Yep, that ref covers all that info. Thanks for the review, Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 01:28, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Alrighty then. Thank you to Julian for getting the stuff I left at the talk page, because I have gone off and passed the article. Congrats. ;) You're welcome on the review. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:31, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Tropical Storm Barry (2001). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 05:52, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 8 external links on Tropical Storm Barry (2001). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 10:53, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Tropical Storm Barry (2001). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:43, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Tropical Storm Barry (2001). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:26, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong link? Please verify

[edit]

Hi there!

When adding some wikilinks to the czech version of this article, I used this version to verify. In the section "Impact": "...Flooding occurred in Leon County and parts of Apalachicola National Forest, where torrential rains flowed into the Cascade Lakes,..."

"Cascade Lakes" are linked to lakes in Oregon. Is this correct?

Thanks --Hnidopichwiki (talk) 10:53, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:Tropical_Storm_Barry_(2001)&oldid=1211232448"