Talk:Treaty of Rapallo (1920)/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Nominator: Tomobe03 (talk · contribs) 22:00, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
Reviewer: ThaesOfereode (talk · contribs) 02:40, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
Dobar dan! This is a good looking article and it looks like most things are in order, but we should fix a few things before I put the rubber stamp on it. THIS ARTICLE HAS PASSED ITS GOOD ARTICLE NOMINATION; THE FOLLOWING TABLE SERVES ONLY TO DEMONSTRATE ITS STATUS PRIOR TO PROMOTION.
Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
---|---|---|
1. Well-written: | ||
![]() |
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. | The articles regarding Dalmatia were largely ignored. There Italy received the city of Zadar and several islands. – What "there" refers to is unclear. Did Italy receive the city of Zadar in the Dalmatian articles? You sometimes capitalize "eastern Adriatic"; don't. Corpus [...] indicated he was ready to trade Italian claims in Dalmatia for British and French backing of Italian territorial demands further north, in Istria. – No comma. In addition to Prime Minister Vesnić and Foreign Minister Trumbić, the Negotiations took place to the economic authorisations issued to them by the (however, most of the Italian territorial gains were reversed in the aftermath of World War II). – No need for the parentheses. Simply rewrite as , though most of the Italian territorial gains were reversed in the aftermath of World War II. The problem of establishing the border between Italy and the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes – known as the Adriatic question – and the future status of Rijeka became major points of dispute at the Paris Peace Conference. – Change the endashes to emdashes, since you've already used emdashes throughout the rest of the article (as per MOS:DASH). |
![]() |
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. | Get rid of both instances of Furthermore (as per MOS:OFCOURSE) and this passes with flying colors. I'd consider putting the name of the treaty in Serbo-Croatian and Italian, but that's not mandatory. |
2. Verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check: | ||
![]() |
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. | Spot check:![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). | Residents of Fiume cheering the arrival of Gabriele D'Annunzio and his Legionari in September 1919, when Fiume had 22,488 (62% of the population) Italians in a total population of 35,839 inhabitants – It doesn't look like this was added by you, but it either needs to be sourced or completely removed. Claim that these people were cheering the arrival of D'Annunzio is found in the image origins. |
![]() |
2c. it contains no original research. | Looks good. |
![]() |
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. | Looks good. Spot check shows clear differentiation between source and prose. |
3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
![]() |
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. | Yep. |
![]() |
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). | Adds good background without going excessively into detail about the War. Same with aftermath. |
![]() |
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. | Balances Italian and Yugoslav claims nicely. |
![]() |
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. | Stable. Most of the last two dozen edits were copy-edits. |
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
![]() |
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. | Looks pretty good. "Territories promised to Italy, by the Entente [...]" is a little iffy, but it passed another GA so I think it's probably fine. Next map seems to have been created by an academic with a WP page, so that's cool. Last map is good. Photos all are clearly marked as public domain. |
![]() |
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. | Not only relevant, but interesting and helpful to understanding the topic at hand. I would consider putting "Prime ministers Giolitti and Vesnić [...]" at the top. |
![]() |
7. Overall assessment. | Just fix the few errors that I pointed out and I think this thing is ready to roll. Congrats on writing a great article! |
Thank you very much for reviewing the article. I intend to address your concerns within two days (maybe three). CheersTomobe03 (talk) 19:25, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- ThaesOfereode Could you please look at the changes to the article. Thanks!Tomobe03 (talk) 22:43, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Tomobe03: Sve u redu. Looks like everything I marked was fixed and I see no reason now not to promote to GA status. This was a wonderful read; I learned a lot. Congratulations on an excellent article! Hope to see you back at GA soon. ThaesOfereode (talk) 00:16, 25 April 2024 (UTC)