Talk:Transquaking River

A fact from Transquaking River appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 30 March 2022 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that an animal rendering and recycling plant dumped illegal amounts of ammonia, phosphorus, and fecal bacteria into the Transquaking River?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2022/March. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Transquaking River.

Wikipedia

Articles for creation

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 31 January 2022 by reviewer اِفلاق (talk · contribs).

Rivers Low‑importance

	Geography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rivers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rivers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RiversWikipedia:WikiProject RiversTemplate:WikiProject RiversRiver articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Maryland Low‑importance

	Maryland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Maryland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Maryland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MarylandWikipedia:WikiProject MarylandTemplate:WikiProject MarylandMaryland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 17:19, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

Transquaking River

... that an animal rendering and recycling company plant in Maryland exceeded ammonia pollution limits in the Transquaking River (pictured) by 25 times? Source: "During three months in the summer of 2020, for example, the plant dumped 25 times the legal limits of ammonia into the Transquaking, a tributary to the Chesapeake Bay." [1]
- ALT1: ... that an animal rendering and recycling company plant was, until recently, consistently dumping illegal amounts of ammonia, phosphorus, and fecal bacteria into the Transquaking River (pictured)? Source: "Maryland’s Department of the Environment (MDE) has administratively extended this outdated permit for 15 years, allowing the facility to continue operating — despite repeated illegal discharges of fecal bacteria, ammonia, phosphorus and other pollutants into the Transquaking River." [2]
- ALT2:... that an animal rendering and recycling company plant dumped illegal amounts of ammonia, phosphorus, and fecal bacteria into the Transquaking River (pictured)?
- ALT3: ... that Valley Proteins Inc, an animal-waste recycler, was dumping hazardous waste into the Transquaking River (pictured)? [source]
- Reviewed: N/A
- Comment: This is my first DYK submission. Let me know if anything need to be changed.

Created by Aethemos (talk). Self-nominated at 03:09, 2 February 2022 (UTC).[reply]

New enough: ✓ Pass
Long enough: ✓ Pass
Sourced: ✓ Pass
Neutral: ✓ Pass
Plagiarism-free: ✓ Pass
Other issues: Nothing showstopping.

- In this sentence:

The plant was consistently dumping illegal amounts of fecal bacteria, ammonia, and phosphorus into the Transquaking River.

I was wondering if it might be possible to replace "consistently" with something more quantative and precise. How long? how much? how frequently?

- On the sourcing might be nice to add in [3] just to shore up the articles sourcing.

- I've suggested an ALT 2 just to tighten the phrasing up. Would appreciate a 2nd opinion.

Seddon ^talk 19:10, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Seddon: Hi! I have incorporated the changes you want. Kindly check if we can close this approval. Thanks RV (talk) 03:12, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Seddon Do we need a new reviewer? SL93 (talk) 02:44, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

New reviewer needed. Previous reviewer had requested a second opinion back in early February. Thank you very much. BlueMoonset (talk) 05:22, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Passing ALT2, agree otherwise at the lack of fault found per Seddon. GTG. SN54129 15:59, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ALT2 to T:DYK/P7