Talk:Transmedicalism

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Transmedicalism article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 60 days

Sexology and sexuality Low‑importance

	Human sexuality portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

LGBT studies

This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBT studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBT-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBT studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBT studiesLGBT articles

Gender studies Low‑importance

This article is part of WikiProject Gender studies. This WikiProject aims to improve the quality of articles dealing with gender studies and to remove systematic gender bias from Wikipedia. If you would like to participate in the project, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.Gender studiesWikipedia:WikiProject Gender studiesTemplate:WikiProject Gender studiesGender studies articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Assess : see Unassessed Gender studies articles and Unknown-importance Gender studies articles
Cleanup : edit to see
Collaborate : see /Collaboration
Copyedit : edit to see
Deletion sorting : see /Sexuality and gender
Expand : edit to see
Infobox : see Gender studies articles needing infoboxes
Merge : edit to see
Notability : edit to see
NPOV : edit to see
Orphans : Brannon Masculinity Scale · Holy Virility · Media and gender · Michael Kaufman (author) · Women's education in Saudi Arabia
Photo : see Wikipedia requested photographs of gender studies
Split : History of feminism
Stubs : see Gender studies stubs
Translate : see /translation
Update : edit to see
Verify : Riot grrrl
Needs attention : see Gender studies articles needing attention

The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, which has been designated as a contentious topic.

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

Work removed without corresponding and it is now locked[edit]

I don't think all the changes should have been removed. No one have been active in responding on the talk page. The edits were done in good faith. I guess some of the history could have been removed, but I was in an ongoing process of improving it. I thought some of the context was relevant. Although I agree it should have been shortened. Other people have for a long time called the page out for being biased. I think this just locks it to bias. Adding history was an attempt to counter the bias that other people have addresed. 217.74.147.240 (talk) 05:28, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

See Wikipedia talk:WikiProject LGBT studies#Massive expansion of "Transmedicalism. The main issues were unreferenced content or synthesis. If a source doesn't use the term "transmedicalism" then it's not relevant enough to use here. Readers can find context using links in the article. This doesn't preclude changing or adding context or provenance, but it has to be reliably sourced and the reference must say what we claim it says. — Bilorv (talk) 22:57, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don’t think there was unreferenced content 80.197.76.157 (talk) 10:11, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extremely biased and misrepresenting article[edit]

This article clearly has a biased agenda, but it appears impossible to edit it to have a more neutral representation. 217.74.147.194 (talk) 17:20, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@217.74.147.194 agreed. See the first paragraph:

Transmedicalism is the idea that being transgender is primarily a medical issue related to the incongruence between an individual's assigned sex at birth and their gender identity, characterized by gender dysphoria.

This idea isn't Transmedicalism, but rather the most common definition of being trans. Transmedicalism, de-facto, is the belief that some people "aren't trans enough" and that one needs to "qualify" to be trans by fitting into specific stereotypes (e.g. transfems not being butch). I don't believe the de-juro definition of Transmedicalism, i.e. how they advertise themselves, is neutral and fitting to Wikipedia. RatherQueerDebator (talk) 07:47, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As for sources:

What is Transmedicalism and why is it bad on Reddit (social media, yes; this is for my de-facto argument)
Transmedicalism on Gender Wiki (non-neutral, yet has references)

I'll provide more if needed; I just find it to be more productive to wait for a response before dedicating effort possibly in vain.

RatherQueerDebator (talk) 08:15, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]