This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Kansas, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Kansas on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.KansasWikipedia:WikiProject KansasTemplate:WikiProject KansasKansas articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oklahoma, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oklahoma on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OklahomaWikipedia:WikiProject OklahomaTemplate:WikiProject OklahomaOklahoma articles
This article is part of WikiProject Missouri, a WikiProject related to the U.S. state of Missouri. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MissouriWikipedia:WikiProject MissouriTemplate:WikiProject MissouriMissouri articles
The tornado used to have an article but was merged with the main article due to how it was too early and preliminary it was, but its been almost 4 months since the tornado the tornado got a lot of publicity and the damage survey is done. Should it get a stand-alone article due to how infamous it is? Joner311 (talk) 00:06, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I've added section about the Lincoln-Waverly EF3 tornado but it got deleted. I want to add it back but I need to know if anyone else agrees with that idea. Hoguert (talk) 23:48, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Just because itself notable doesn’t mean it needs a section. The summary fits in the table, which makes a section unnecessary. ChessEric01:39, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]