This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bible, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Bible on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BibleWikipedia:WikiProject BibleTemplate:WikiProject BibleBible
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Saints, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Saints and other individuals commemorated in Christianliturgical calendars on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SaintsWikipedia:WikiProject SaintsTemplate:WikiProject SaintsSaints
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Iran, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles related to Iran on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project where you can contribute to the discussions and help with our open tasks.IranWikipedia:WikiProject IranTemplate:WikiProject IranIran
Merge for now, anyway. There are at least six shrines purported to be the "Tomb of Daniel" (Susa, Kirkuk, Samarkand, Tarsus, Alexandria, Baqubah), and it's probable that eventually one or two of these will have enough info for separate articles.--Pharos10:07, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Merge. Although I agree Daniel's Tomb is the better name for the combined article, I believe the approach taken in Tomb of Daniel, which discusses the issue in general without focusing on any one site, should be preferred, so most of the content should come from that article. The present Daniel's Tomb article, which focuses on a single candidate site, should be shortened and summarized into a section of the main article. Best, --Shirahadasha19:49, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. I actually like the Tomb of Daniel title better (it's more formal), but whatever. I do strongly disagree that anything should be shortened — this information is all highly relevant.--Pharos20:07, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]