Talk:Timeline of the South China Sea dispute

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Southeast Asia: Brunei Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Southeast Asia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Southeast Asia-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Southeast AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject Southeast AsiaTemplate:WikiProject Southeast AsiaSoutheast Asia
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Brunei.

China Mid‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Malaysia Mid‑importance

	Malaysia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Malaysia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Malaysia and Malaysia-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MalaysiaWikipedia:WikiProject MalaysiaTemplate:WikiProject MalaysiaMalaysia
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tambayan Philippines Mid‑importance

	Philippines portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tambayan Philippines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to the Philippines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Tambayan PhilippinesWikipedia:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesTemplate:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesPhilippine-related
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Taiwan Mid‑importance

	Taiwan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Taiwan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Taiwan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TaiwanWikipedia:WikiProject TaiwanTemplate:WikiProject TaiwanTaiwan
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Vietnam Mid‑importance

	Vietnam portal This article is part of WikiProject Vietnam, an attempt to create a comprehensive, neutral, and accurate representation of Vietnam on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.VietnamWikipedia:WikiProject VietnamTemplate:WikiProject VietnamVietnam
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

East Asia (defunct)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject East Asia, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.East AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject East AsiaTemplate:WikiProject East AsiaEast Asia

2017 Events

Well, 2017 is ending. No updates for the whole year? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.83.103.209 (talk) 03:36, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Timeline of the South China Sea dispute. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.philippinenews.com/read/latest-news/8067-vietnams-angry-at-taiwan-as-it-stages-live-fire-drill-in-the-spratlys.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 07:06, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Timeline of the South China Sea dispute. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120811152125/http://www.washingtontimes.com:80/news/2012/aug/8/inside-the-ring-china-warship-grounded/?page=all to http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/aug/8/inside-the-ring-china-warship-grounded/?page=all

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 05:41, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Statements of YASAY CORRECTED

So easy to take off Hague ruling.. If the regular WIKIPEDIA works around here, eplease reinsert these periodicals as footnote.. YSay is just new and didn't know much what he is to say in public.. He got booed all over the country then be had a moment of awakening.. Read his retraction... CHINA

http://www.rappler.com/nation/144089-philippines-black-sand-china-artificial-islands-dfa

http://www.rappler.com/newsbreak/iq/139252-cheat-sheet-compilation-philippines-china-case-hague

http://www.rappler.com/nation/140235-philippines-says-imminent-talks-over-china-sea-row-unlikely

http://www.rappler.com/nation/138305-dfa-secretary-yasay-philippines-afraid-china

http://www.defensenews.com/story/defense/2016/07/12/manila-wins-south-china-sea-arbitration-case-hague/86984274/

http://www.rappler.com/newsbreak/iq/139252-cheat-sheet-compilation-philippines-china-case-hague

http://globalnation.inquirer.net/34369/scarborough-belongs-to-ph-old-maps-show

http://m.inquirer.net/globalnation/99689

http://www.rappler.com/nation/144089-philippines-black-sand-china-artificial-islands-dfa

http://www.rappler.com/newsbreak/iq/139252-cheat-sheet-compilation-philippines-china-case-hague

http://www.rappler.com/nation/140235-philippines-says-imminent-talks-over-china-sea-row-unlikely

http://www.rappler.com/nation/138305-dfa-secretary-yasay-philippines-afraid-china

http://www.defensenews.com/story/defense/2016/07/12/manila-wins-south-china-sea-arbitration-case-hague/86984274/

http://www.rappler.com/newsbreak/iq/139252-cheat-sheet-compilation-philippines-china-case-hague

http://globalnation.inquirer.net/34369/scarborough-belongs-to-ph-old-maps-show

http://m.inquirer.net/globalnation/99689

Bebe0114 (talk) 17:50, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

Chinese frigate Dongguan aground on Half Moon Shoal.jpg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 14:37, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nobody should say it belongs to any country

The article has claimed all the islands belongs to Vietnam as if that's a fact. But multiple countries including Taiwan, Indonesia, Philippines and China always disagreed. Where is the source that claims those islands officially belong to Vietnam and nobody else? It seems biased to take a dispute and make a bold unilateral claim like this. You can say it's associated but you can't claim it "belongs" to Vietnam. Nobody can actually say it belongs to any country as the dispute was never once firmly resolved for the past plus centuries. I have recently changed the wording from "belonging" into "associated by France". Because you can neutrally say those islands are "associated" with various entities and regions including a realm in Vietnam, but it's not neutral to claim it belongs to Vietnam, as there's no treaty or agreement that resolved this multi party dispute which is still ongoing. 49.186.227.219 (talk) 00:38, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of instances of Freedomland Free Territory

Pinging @Vacosea for attention. I noticed the removal of mention of Free Territory of Freedomland from the article, even if the subject has an article which contains some references. I hope this is reinstated but now with source. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:25, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The paragraph I removed did not have a citation since 2021, but I have now added information from the main article and its sources. Vacosea (talk) 17:44, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]