Jump to content

Talk:Timeline of Canadian elections

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former featured listTimeline of Canadian elections is a former featured list. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page and why it was removed. If it has improved again to featured list standard, you may renominate the article to become a featured list.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 4, 2007Featured list candidatePromoted
January 30, 2007Featured topic candidatePromoted
June 16, 2010Featured topic removal candidateDemoted
October 18, 2021Featured list removal candidateDemoted
Current status: Former featured list

Untitled

[edit]

Wow. Well done. --Arctic Gnome 05:57, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank-you very much :-) Tompw (talk) 17:51, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]


References needed

[edit]

Tompw (talk) 17:51, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Due to a change in the featured topic criteria, the Canadian election timelines featured topic has 3 months to satisfy criterion 3.c. by getting a peer review done for the audited article in the topic: List of Nunavut general elections. Rreagan007 (talk) 04:14, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Largely blank columns

[edit]

With the 13 provinces/territories entering confederation at different points in history, there are lengthy white columns, that I find unnecessary. I would suggest removing the provinces/territories from the sections where they didn't exist, but the 33/40/40/36 length is a bit of applying an artificial sorting convention. I think it should be when provinces/territories joined confederation like this:

  • 1867-1897
  • 1898-1948 (or 1898-1922 & 1923-1948, or insert a abbr. row above 1923)
  • 1949-1998 (or 1949-1973 & 1974-1998, or insert a abbr. row above 1974)
  • 1999-2015

Or at least remove them from the existing section set up. Thoughts? 117Avenue (talk) 04:48, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well, since there appears to be no objection, I will go ahead with the changes. 117Avenue (talk) 05:06, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Removing colour-dependence

[edit]

As this list currently stands, the winning party is conveyed solely through use of background colour. I feel this goes against the spirit of WP:ACCESS, so I would like to propose an additional way of conveying this information. My thought was to add an abberviation of the winning party (one or two letters) under each date, with an explanation of the abbreviations in teh colour-key table at the top. Possibly the abbreviation would be linked to the relavtn party article, or it could be 'hover text' to explain the abbreviation (Hover your mouse over this text). What do people think of this idea? Tompw (talk) (review) 20:12, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think extra text would clutter up the table. A colour code table can be found at the top, and bottom of the page. 117Avenue (talk) 01:22, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
If we don't have the extra text, how can we make the informaiton in teh table accessible to those who are colour-blind (or even blind)? Tompw (talk) (review) 02:13, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I'm only slightly colour blind and I can't really tell the differences between all the shades of blue. It's also much more difficult for me to memorise colours - acronyms, however, I can figure out in a snap. aethre (talk) 20:09, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Numbering of Elections/Assemblies

[edit]

Nova Scotia and New Brunswick did not re-sequence their numbering of assemblies after confederation like Quebec and Ontario. Should their proper numbers be shown in the table as is the case for PEI and Newfoundland who also held elections prior to joining confederation? Therefore NB would start at 21st election and Nova Scotia at 24th rather than 1st for the two of them. M Dellapinna 00:31, 28 July 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mdellapinna (talkcontribs)

Please read the three of the four sections on Talk:Next Nova Scotia general election, that discuss the article name, and follow the sources. If the numbers still confuse you, take a look at User:117Avenue/Atlantic Canada elections, which lists them in a table. 117Avenue (talk) 04:21, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

This article, as well as List of Canadian federal general elections unfortunately does not have any inline citations and thus should not be considered a featured list. I mentioned the issue on Wikipedia:WikiProject_Elections_and_Referendums however no one had time/energy to make the rather arduous citations. I will nominate this article as well as the other, but will first see if anyone watching this talk page would like to take on the task first. Mattximus (talk) 20:30, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Timeline of Canadian elections. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 02:01, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 13 external links on Timeline of Canadian elections. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:20, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Timeline of Canadian elections. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:26, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]