Talk:Tim Worstall

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Arts and Entertainment

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.

Watch out, the truth is about.

http://timworstall.com/2008/02/02/wikipedia-edits/

Ho, hum. Surreptitious Evil (talk) 12:11, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

db-person/notability

References either don't work (4) or seem to link to authors own blog; as such this seems to be based on little more than self promotion (re:SPIP). No significant coverage independent of the subject specifically regarding the subject. Zaq12wsx (talk) 22:47, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What you say appears to be true, but see CSD A7: the article does make credible claims of significance/importance, so to get this deleted you'll have to PROD or AFD it. —SMALL JIM 23:36, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I have completely rewritten the article and I think it's fine now. Jonathan A Jones (talk) 11:31, 17 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposal for deletion

The man is a despicable figure, and certainly does not deserve to be mentioned on wikipedia. I urge the administrators to delete this drivel. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 158.143.230.177 (talk) 12:55, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not censored, and just because one is a despicable figure does not qualify for a person to be deleted. For instance, there is a article on Adolf Hitler, deleting it would make no sense as Wikipedia is intended to store information and history. And should you find said person despicable, would it not be in your favour to keep the article so people may learn why said figure is despicable? — Félix Wolf (talk | contribs) 13:03, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your prompt reply Felix, what I meant was that the aforementioned individual has neither the merit nor the influence to be referred to on wikipedia. The individual in question is a mere jester in British politics and has no influence whatsoever in current events. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 158.143.230.177 (talk) 11:24, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Education

1987, third class degree in Economics. cagliost (talk) 10:49, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Source? Jonathan A Jones (talk) 14:05, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[1] "TW: 1987, Econ, Third"

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Tim Worstall. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140720013112/http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/finance/author/timworstall/ to http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/finance/author/timworstall/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:38, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]