Talk:Thus have I heard

Thus have I heard has been listed as one of the Philosophy and religion good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: April 10, 2019. (Reviewed version).

A fact from Thus have I heard appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 6 December 2018 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that most Buddhist discourses start with the words Thus have I heard, which are traditionally attributed to the attendant of the Buddha?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2018/December. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Thus have I heard.

Wikipedia

Asia

	Asia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Asia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Asia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject AsiaTemplate:WikiProject AsiaAsia articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article was created or improved during WikiProject Asia's "Asian 10,000 Challenge", which started in October 2016 and is still continuing. You can help!

Buddhism Mid‑importance

	This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Buddhism, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with Buddhism. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page for more details on the projects.BuddhismWikipedia:WikiProject BuddhismTemplate:WikiProject BuddhismBuddhism articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Religious texts (defunct)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religious texts, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.Religious textsWikipedia:WikiProject Religious textsTemplate:WikiProject Religious textsReligious texts articles

India: History / Literature Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Indian history workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Indian literature workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article was last assessed in November 2018.

Nepal Low‑importance

	Nepal portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Nepal, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Nepal-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page and add your name to the member's list.NepalWikipedia:WikiProject NepalTemplate:WikiProject NepalNepal articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Anthropology: Oral tradition

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anthropology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anthropology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnthropologyWikipedia:WikiProject AnthropologyTemplate:WikiProject AnthropologyAnthropology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by Oral tradition taskforce.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Thus have I heard/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Gen. Quon (talk · contribs) 22:35, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I will review this in the next week or so.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 22:35, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I look forward to it.--Farang Rak Tham (Talk) 21:07, 5 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Farang Rak Tham: I came down ill the last few days.. Sorry for the delay! I'll get to this review this week definitely.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 23:51, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, great, Gen. Quon!--Farang Rak Tham (Talk) 07:46, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Farang Rak Tham: I apologize that it took me so long to get to this. For the most part, this is a very well-written, interesting article. I did some minor copy-editing/moving stuff (here), and if any of that rubs you the wrong way, feel free to revert. What follows are some issues/suggestions:

I'm a fan of including a reference after every incidence of quotation. I'd recommend doing so after "could by itself quite adequately explain it" just so we're clear where that is coming from.

Done, you're right, that's how it should be done.--Farang Rak Tham (Talk) 06:49, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Indologist Konrad Klaus [de] disagrees with Brough..." This comes a paragraph after Brough is discussed. Is there a way to rearrange this so that it immediately follows Brough's introduction? I think that would be a bit more logical.

I have merged the two paragraphs. Will that suffice?--Farang Rak Tham (Talk) 06:49, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

That reads better.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 14:08, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Religious Studies scholar Mark Tatz disagrees with Galloway's interpretation, however, though Galloway rejects most of Tatz' arguments." This is a confusingly worded sentence. I'd recommend re-writing, or breaking into two smaller sentences.

Done.--Farang Rak Tham (Talk) 06:49, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

What is the publisher for Klaus 2007?

Added.--Farang Rak Tham (Talk) 06:49, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Totally option suggestion: add location for the book references.

Doing....--Farang Rak Tham (Talk) 06:49, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Done.--Farang Rak Tham (Talk) 07:08, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

That's all I can find. Putting on hold.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 21:47, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Good job! Thanks for the speedy turn around (and again, sorry about my slow delay)! This is a very interesting article and I'm happy to see it promoted.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 14:08, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!--Farang Rak Tham (Talk) 15:41, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Kumarajiva at Kizil Caves, Kuqa.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:37, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]