Talk:Thurman v. City of Torrington

	Connecticut portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Connecticut, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Connecticut on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConnecticutWikipedia:WikiProject ConnecticutTemplate:WikiProject ConnecticutConnecticut
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Law

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Feminism

	Feminism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Feminism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Feminism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FeminismWikipedia:WikiProject FeminismTemplate:WikiProject FeminismFeminism
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Women's History

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Trans-Wiki to the Actual Court Decision?

We probably should trans-wiki this article to an article about the actual court decision instead of the person herself. Also, I revert the recent removal of the one source on the grounds of WP:CIV, as the edit summary simply said "source is crap" [1]. While the source links to Yahoo Answers, the page there speaks of four other sources. A lot of references exist about the court case itself, so as I said probably would be best to move the article. -OberRanks (talk) 21:11, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done for now. -OberRanks (talk) 21:23, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Material Removed

I have removed material from this article that does not comply with our policy on the biographies of living persons. Biographical material must always be referenced from reliable sources, especially negative material. Negative material that does not comply with that must be immediately removed. Note that the removal does not imply that the information is either true or false.

Please do not reinsert this material unless you can provide reliable citations, and can ensure it is written in a neutral tone. Please review the relevant policies before editing in this regard. Editors should note that failure to follow this policy may result in the removal of editing privileges.--Scott Mac 21:13, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hint. Answers.com is not a reliable source.--Scott Mac 21:14, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

See comments above. We should trans-wiki to an article about the court case, which is very well sourced. -OberRanks (talk) 21:16, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Found some more data. The full name of the law inspired by the court case was the "Family Violence Act of 1986" - this is the "Thurman Law" that is often referred to by other sources. Found several web hits for it, should be possible to merge in the data about the subsequent law with the court case. -OberRanks (talk) 21:31, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Spelling

Which is it, "Tracy" or "Tracey"?