Talk:Three men make a tiger

This article was nominated for deletion on 7 December 2005. The result of the discussion was KEEP.

Business Mid‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

China Mid‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Philosophy: Logic Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Logic

Reverse argument ?

Logical fallacies usually have a reverse side. Is there an "official" reverse fallacy to this one (going around something like an anti-democratic argument: "everybody says it, then it must be false - didn't Plato and Socrate themselves show that majority is wrong?")? (of course, Plato never says majority was always wrong, so he would never support this argument!!) Kaliz 13:27, 14 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

On a reverse fallacy there is a story that might be based on an actual event. Anyone in rural France in the Renaissance a bunch of peasants began describing what we'd call meteorites hitting fields in the region. The leading scientist scoffed because "rocks don't fall from the sky" and numerous people saying they did doesn't make it true. Now we know meteorites do fall from the sky, etc. The scientist in the story has been said to be Thomas Jefferson or an unknown member of the Royal Society. I'm not sure "rocks don't fall from the sky" is used as an opposite proverb, but it seems like it might be.--T. Anthony 04:08, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

could be merged with ad polulum but must not

This could be merged with argumentum ad populum if the only difference is cultural but the matter is identical but it doesn't have to be berged because it is long, special and specific enough (by culture alone) to stay on its own. Just nominate it for merge before you nominate it for deletion. --Ollj 21:47, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WP:RS, WP:VERIFY and Tiger tales

I've used my copy of this tale, A Tale about a Tiger, as a hopefully humorous note of explanation when people remark "but I've heard this is true!" Shenme 19:40, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]