Talk:Three Sisters (District of Columbia)

United States: District of Columbia Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Washington, D.C. portal This article is supported by WikiProject District of Columbia (assessed as Low-importance).

Islands

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of islands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslandsWikipedia:WikiProject IslandsTemplate:WikiProject IslandsIslands articles

Removal of Three Sisters Bridge

The article says that opposition to the three sisters bridge in 1972 led to its cancellation, but this post shows Arlington has scrapped plans for the bridge by 1966. Anybody know any more details? 141.161.137.230 (talk) 21:52, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Various locales had responsibility for building the bridge. The new citation says that, after Rep. Natcher's blackmail efforts were overturned by the House in 1972, the bridge was effectively dead. The rest of the Schrag book (uncited here, because it is not necessary to this article about the rocks) points out D.C. kept the bridge on its highway maps (unfunded, unwanted, no work done to begin it) until 1976. Arlington County probably did as well (there were big battles going on over I-66 construction and whether to link it to a nonexistent Three Sisters Bridge). U.S. Dept. of Transportation did not delete the bridge from their plans until 1977. "Keeping something in the plans for political reasons" and "actively building a bridge" are two different things, and I think we see that here. - Tim1965 (talk) 18:09, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Three Sisters (District of Columbia)/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Suggest changes due to current bias in article. The limited construction which had begun on the bridge footing was damaged by hurricane-caused flooding, not leftist student radicals.

^[1]

Craigie4 (talk) 00:02, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 00:02, 14 September 2009 (UTC). Substituted at 08:42, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

References

^ http://www.dcroads.net/roads/potomac-river/

[1] ttp://www.dcroads.net/roads/potomac-river/

[1]