Talk:Thermodynamic modelling

	Engineering portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EngineeringWikipedia:WikiProject EngineeringTemplate:WikiProject EngineeringEngineering articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Physics Low‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Suggestions[edit]

@Nimarazmjoo Than you for your contributions. Footnotes should be inserted along the text (at the end of any sentence or at least of any paragraph). In the "References" section you have to put only the "reference list" tag you'll find in "edit", menu "insert" at the bottom. You need also to put in bold style the subject of the article in the lead section in the first phrase. Good work. Marco Chemello (WMIT) (talk) 13:40, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pure component modelling[edit]

@Nimarazmjoo I think that this section can be maybe better explained in order to be more clear for the readers who are not very familiar with the topic Shoba98 (talk) 13:00, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Shoba98 Hi there! Thanks for the feedback! I tried to clarify it more without going further in details. Nimarazmjoo (talk) 13:29, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Nimarazmjoo Great, besides that article is very good. Compliments for the good work! Shoba98 (talk) 13:44, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

General comment[edit]

Hi,

The article is generally well-written. Sometimes, I found some difficulties in reading because some sentences are quite long and articulated.

I agree with @Shoba98 about the section on pure component modelling

Good job anyway! Paolo Gajoni (talk) 14:25, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback from New Page Review process[edit]

I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Well-researched, clear and easy to read lead section. Thank you for the contribution!

Oaktree b (talk) 21:23, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]