Talk:Theano (philosopher)

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Philosophy: Philosophers / Ancient Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Philosophers
	Ancient philosophy

Greece Low‑importance

	Greece portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greek people on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreek articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Classical Greece and Rome Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Mathematics

	Mathematics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MathematicsWikipedia:WikiProject MathematicsTemplate:WikiProject Mathematicsmathematics articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's priority scale.

Women's History Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women scientists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women scientists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women scientistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women scientistsTemplate:WikiProject Women scientistsWomen scientists articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

History of Science Mid‑importance

	History of science portal This article is part of the History of Science WikiProject, an attempt to improve and organize the history of science content on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. You can also help with the History of Science Collaboration of the Month.History of ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject History of ScienceTemplate:WikiProject History of Sciencehistory of science articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 24 August 2020 and 20 December 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Mikrovolnofka.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 11:14, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Golden mean

Removed "and was responsible for the concepts of the golden mean, golden ratio, and golden rectangle" since there is no citation for this. As no writings by Theano survive, and the article on the Golden Ratio http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Golden_ratio#History says:

"The ancient Greeks usually attributed its discovery to Pythagoras (or to the Pythagoreans, notably Theodorus) or to Hippasus of Metapontum."

there does not appear to be any evidence to support the idea that she originated these concepts. Also, "golden mean" and "golden ratio" are generally used as synonyms, not separate concepts. 156.34.38.255 - 26th May 2006

Golden mean, part deux

Although there is a reference in the current page to "her most important work was related to the philosophical principle of the golden mean", it would be nice to know the ancient source of this information. All that I can find is a modern source that claims it was in her treatise On Virtue. Singinglemon (talk) 19:50, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

More specifically, the earliest work I can find which asserts that Theano wrote about the golden mean is Mary Ritter Beard, (1931), On Understanding Women, page 139 [1]. It could just be that Mary Ritter Beard noticed that one work attributed to Theano was called On Virtue and simply conjectured that this work was about the golden mean. Later books which assert this [2] just seem to be uncritically copying and improving upon what Mary Ritter Beard wrote. Singinglemon (talk) 17:59, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, there are many bogus sources, like those that mix up the golden mean (philosophy) with the golden ratio. But that's not sufficient reason to conclude that all sources are bogus. If Ritter made a mistake, one would need to find some specific indication of that. Dicklyon (talk) 05:46, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I should make it clear that I do not assert that all sources are bogus, but I have looked into this matter with some care. The only books that I can find which associate Theano with the Golden Mean are either unreferenced tertiary works, or specifically reference Ritter as the source [3]. Feel free to provide any primary source, or or a secondary source which which explains why it is believed that Theano wrote about the Golden Mean. Anyway, I shall explain in more detail what the problem is on Talk:Golden mean (philosophy), since that's the page this is most affecting. Singinglemon (talk) 08:49, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Is Theano an inspiration for the name of the machine learning package of the same name.

I'm wondering if the python machine learning library Theano was named after her. With her being an early mathematician, and all.

There might be some documentation somewhere that states what the Theano package was named after, and if it is, maybe a short statement could be added to this page?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theano_(software) Nateguimondart (talk) 03:57, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Rewrite

I've rewritten large parts of the page, referencing modern scholarship.

Added ancient attributions of the various conflicting biographical details.
Added scholarly interpretations of the preserved fragment and letters. the Stobaeus fragment seems to have been written as part of a polemic to counter the criticisms of Aristotle, which is worth discussing in detail, and the letters have had a fair bit of modern scholarship on them as well due to their insight into the role of women in the Hellenistic period. Probably more can be said about this, I've added a few more sources that discuss this to the Further Reading section.
Removed Waithe's theory of Theano I and Theano II: Given how harsh her reviewer was about the Theano section and the Two Theanos theory specifically (which doesn't actually seem to be based on any previous philological scholarship and cites none), I think we should exclude Waithe's theory from the article as WP:UNDUE. Pretty much every classical scholar agrees that all the writings are pseudepigraphic, so the number of pseudepigraphic authors isn't necessary and the existing scholarship seems shaky, probably best to take an agnostic approach until there's scholarship based in philological evidence to cite directly.
Removed the bit about children - the children are typically ascribed to Pythagoras, and only some traditions have Pythagoras as the husband of Theano, so we can't conclude that all children attributed to Pythagoras are attributed to Theano.
Removed the mathematics categories - The only modern source in the article is about how she wasn't a mathematician.

- car chasm (talk) 02:05, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]