Jump to content

Talk:The Way I Loved You

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleThe Way I Loved You has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 5, 2024Good article nomineeListed

Expanding

[edit]

Hello @Gained:. Is it okay if I jump in to expand this (yet to be) article with you? Ippantekina (talk) 07:58, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, and actually, you can do everything you want in it. I abandoned this article a few days ago because I got bored. Gained (talk) 08:02, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:The Way I Loved You (Taylor Swift song)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Gained (talk · contribs) 04:36, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: K. Peake (talk · contribs) 08:58, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a. (prose, spelling, and grammar):
    b. (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a. (reference section):
    b. (citations to reliable sources):
    c. (OR):
    d. (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a. (major aspects):
    b. (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
    b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/fail:

(Criteria marked are unassessed)

I will review this fully today! --K. Peake 08:58, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox and lead

[edit]
  • Infobox looks good both times!
  • "She wrote the track with John Rich and produced it" → "She wrote the song with John Rich and served as a producer"
  • ""The Way I Loved You" is about" → "it is about"
  • Remove pipe on country since contemporary country is linked in the same sentence, making this come across as a WP:OVERLINK
  • "snare drum and loud and subtle" → "snare drum, and loud and subtle"
  • Make the reception sentence the first one of the second para instead
  • Add a comma after Hot 100 and mention that the certification was in the United States
  • "the United States," → "the US," per MOS:US on mentions after the first instances
  • "received certifications from" should be a new sentence saying "The song received platinum and silver certifications in Australia and the United Kingdom from the..." and then mention the two certification organizations, respectively
  • "The re-recorded track received mostly positive comments" → "The re-recording received mostly positive reviews"

Background and writing

[edit]
  • "contain autobiographical themes," → "contains autobiographical themes,"
  • "said that Rich "was able to relate to it because" → "said that Rich managed to be relatable "because" to avoid overquoting and re-invoke the ref at the end of each of these sentences that use direct quotes
    •  Not done – I'm not sure about the sentence you suggested, I had to read it a couple times to understand it. I'm thinking of something like "said that Rich managed to feel for it" or something like that; what do you think? Gained (talk) 05:47, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Releases

[edit]
  • Img looks good!
  • Remove link on Fearless and mention the position of the track on the album
    I just added another source to mention and verify the track's position. Gained (talk) 10:35, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Mention that the certification was in the United States
  • Remove overly obvious link on Lisbon since this is a capital city
  • Second para looks good!
  • "with peaks of 94[21] and 24,[22]" → "with peaks at numbers 94[21] and 24,[22]"
  • Mention the two countries those certifications were in

Music and lyrics

[edit]
  • ""The Way I Loved You" is a" → "Musically, "The Way I Loved You" is a"
  • "oriented country[4] and rock" → "oriented country, rock" and I would suggest moving all of these refs to the end of the sentence as the order generally lines up with info here
Whoops, I didn't saw that. Thank you for mentioning it! Gained (talk) 13:00, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Critical reception

[edit]
  • "and wrote that the production was" → "and that the production was"
  • "evoked her previous "Avril Lavigne-esque sneer [...] hits" but" → "evoked Swift's previous "Avril Lavigne-esque sneer [...] hits", but"
  • "delightfully dramatic" [...] which," → "delightfully dramatic – which,"
  • "was devoid of "radio-ready hooks and megawatt" → "is devoid of radio-friendly hooks and "megawatt"
  • "gave it "new life"." → "give it "new life"."
  • Remove link on Vulture

Personnel

[edit]

Charts

[edit]
  • Good

Certifications

[edit]
  • Shouldn't this section follow the previous one's blueprint of having the separate tables and captions rather than sub-sections especially since the first version only had one certification?
    • Oh yeah, I just noticed it and I have removed it to follow the previous section's format. Thank you for the thorough observation, it seems strange that we have different formats for these sections. Gained (talk) 05:47, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note

[edit]
  • Good

References

[edit]
  • Copyvio score looks safe at 23.1%!!!!
  • Ref 1 should cite the original URL (https://www.songwriteruniverse.com/taylorswift123.htm) with the archived link rather than the homepage of the website and the current duplicate of the same URL and fix MOS:QWQ issues
  • Replace ref 7 and 18's people parameter with the others parameter
  • Cite MTV as publisher instead on ref 11
  • I am confused by ref 14; the original URL is CNN but the archive is CTV News, which one are you meaning to cite?

Sources

[edit]
  • Good

Final comments and verdict

[edit]