Talk:The King of Fighters '96
 | The King of Fighters '96 has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: December 12, 2024. (Reviewed version). |
 | The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future: |
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:The King of Fighters '96/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: Tintor2 (talk · contribs) 23:46, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: TeenAngels1234 (talk · contribs) 21:44, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
Stay tuned.--TeenAngels1234 (talk) 21:44, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- "The game made a few changes to gameplay, such as the introduction of new techniques, and made various changes to the composition of some teams, with a few of them introducing new characters". Isn't too vague, with all these various, some etc?
- Revised.
- "and with which Iori is connected by sharing a similar fighting style due to his predecessor's curse". Can you explain it better?
- Expanded
- "Many people attended the word-of-mouth tests". Ditto.
- Expanded
- Too many "was", "were", et simila in Release and Related media. Try to rewrite all of them.
- "only in Japan,." There's a superfluous comma.
- Done.
@Tintor2: Nothing to say about Reception.--TeenAngels1234 (talk) 21:23, 11 December 2024 (UTC) @TeenAngels1234: Tried revising everything. Thanks for the feedback.Tintor2 (talk) 21:40, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Is it well written?
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- Is it verifiable with no original research?
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines:
- C. It contains no original research:
- D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- Is it neutral?
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- Is it stable?
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Good job.
- Pass or Fail: