Talk:The Habit of Fire/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Novice7 | Talk 09:36, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

Okay, this article is not close to GA criteria.

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   Prose could use some tweaking. Also, quoted information should be inside quotes. No external links on the lead.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   I'm unsure about forum usage. Maybe some other source? Also, Band line-up needs verification.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   Nothing mentioned about critical reception, charts etc.

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

   I don't see any biased stuff.

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

   No edit-wars or stuffs.

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   The album art could use a better rationale.

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Sorry. You have to work more. See Breakout (album) or Ray of Light or Reign in Blood for an example.