Jump to content

Talk:The Habit of Fire

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good article nomineeThe Habit of Fire was a Music good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 12, 2011Good article nomineeNot listed

GA fail

[edit]

Okay, here is list of what the GA review found:

1. It is reasonably well written. a (prose): Neutral b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): Neutral Prose could use some tweaking. Also, quoted information should be inside quotes. No external links on the lead. -[Will do]

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): Fail b (citations to reliable sources): Don't Know c (OR): Pass I'm unsure about forum usage. Maybe some other source? -[Which ref? If UltimateMetal interview, the band has officially approved it. on Facebook] Also, Band line-up needs verification. -[Done]

3. It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): Fail b (focused): Neutral Nothing mentioned about critical reception, charts etc. -[No chart info, I will expand critical reception and the like]

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: Pass I don't see any biased stuff. -[Yay!]

5. It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: Pass No edit-wars or stuffs. -[Yay!]

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): Neutral b (appropriate use with suitable captions): Neutral The album art could use a better rationale. -[Done]

7. Overall: Pass/Fail: Fail Sorry. You have to work more. See Breakout (album) or Ray of Light or Reign in Blood for an example. --3family6 (talk) 14:38, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]