Talk:The Great Mecca Feast
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the The Great Mecca Feast article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from The Great Mecca Feast appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 6 June 2024 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
The Great Mecca Feast has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: December 1, 2024. (Reviewed version). |
Did you know nomination
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Launchballer talk 22:57, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
( )
- ... that The Great Mecca Feast by George Krugers (pictured) has been identified as the first documentary film about the hajj pilgrimage?
- Source: Ray, Sandeep (2023). "What Did the Haji Jawa See in Mecca? A Film from 1928 as a Primary Source". Historical Journal of Film, Radio & Television. 43 (4): 1024.
- ALT1: ... that George Krugers (pictured) was circumcised so he could pass as Muslim and film The Great Mecca Feast? Source: Reichling, Rukayyah (2022). "A Colonial Gaze on Mecca: Networks Surrounding the First Documentary about the Hajj". Journal of Material Cultures in the Muslim World. 3: 354.
{{cite journal}}
: CS1 maint: ref duplicates default (link) - Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Satanoperca lilith
Created by Crisco 1492 (talk).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 659 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.— Chris Woodrich (talk) 15:02, 5 May 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: QPQ done, well-written article, very interesting hook and image is in the public domain. Looks good to go. Makeandtoss (talk) 13:20, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:The Great Mecca Feast/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: Crisco 1492 (talk · contribs) 16:28, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: Jon698 (talk · contribs) 03:57, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
Hello @Crisco 1492:, I'll begin reviewing this article over the next few days. It looks promising from a first glance. Jon698 (talk) 03:57, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.
- a (reference section): b (inline citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- I checked all of the sources and found that the text accurately reflects what is within them. I added one extra line about him traveling to Jeddah aboard the SS Madioen. I found no plagiarism or copyright violations.
- a (reference section): b (inline citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- This article covers the plot, production, reception, and legacy of the film in great detail. This is probably 99% of the information you can learn about this subject due to its obscurity in the English-speaking world.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- The article is neutral and has no biased material in it.
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars and only a few edits within the past few months.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- All of the images are either fair use or public domain in the United States.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Good job @Crisco 1492: on improving such an obscure piece of media. Here is another article you have improved to GA status.
- Pass/Fail:
Categories:
- GA-Class Netherlands articles
- Netherlands main page DYK articles
- All WikiProject Netherlands pages
- GA-Class Indonesia articles
- Low-importance Indonesia articles
- WikiProject Indonesia articles
- GA-Class film articles
- GA-Class Silent films articles
- Silent films task force articles
- GA-Class Southeast Asian cinema articles
- Southeast Asian cinema task force articles
- WikiProject Film articles
- GA-Class Islam-related articles
- Low-importance Islam-related articles
- WikiProject Islam articles
- Wikipedia Did you know articles
- Wikipedia good articles
- Media and drama good articles