Talk:The Ellsworth American
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the The Ellsworth American article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Move request
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Page not moved – move proposal withdrawn (self-closed after only opposition was expressed – as allowed per WP:RMCI). BarrelProof (talk) 22:21, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
The Ellsworth American → Ellsworth American – WP:THE. In most cases, we omit "The" from the names of articles about newspapers on Wikipedia. BarrelProof (talk) 15:56, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose: Some newspapers would be preceded with 'the' e.g. the Los Angeles Times, the New York Post, although not part of the official logo and name unlike: The New York Times or The Washington Post which do include it. The official website includes the definite article. --[[ axg ◉ talk ]] 21:54, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
- Thank you for pointing that out. I wasn't very confident, which is why I submitted the move request for discussion instead of doing a "bold" move. I thought I had checked the New York Times, but now I see that you're right about that. I would be happy to withdraw the request at this point (but I don't know whether Wikipedia allows self-closing of move requests). However, I do still suggest that a redirect be created. If no one objects to that, I may go ahead and do it. I had not previously done that since I thought just moving the article might be the better choice. —BarrelProof (talk) 22:06, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.