Talk:The Citadel (1983 TV series)

BBC Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject BBC, an attempt to better organise information in articles related to the BBC. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join us as a member. You can also visit the BBC Portal.BBCWikipedia:WikiProject BBCTemplate:WikiProject BBCBBC

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tasks for WikiProject BBC:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Improve BBC, BBC News (TV channel) and BBC News to Good Article status following previous reviews, create BBC Computer Literacy Project (in light of forthcoming 30th anniversary)
Cleanup : Chucklevision - references and general clean-up, Pebble Mill Studios - over-detailed and long, BBC World Service Television - unreferenced and confusing
Copyedit : BBC News, Broadcasting House
Expand : Top 20 start-class BBC articles with most importance: BBC Japan, BBC World Service Television, BBC Lifestyle, BBC Two Northern Ireland
NPOV : Criticism of the BBC (See comments)
Stubs : Stub-Class BBC articles
Other : *Restructure the category
- Add infoboxes to the BBC articles without infoboxes
- Add free-use images to biographical articles where possible
- Add references to Goa Mix (see assessment) and Coat of arms of the BBC
- Return Dad's Army to a Good article. (See comments)
- Reassess BBC following improvements to article.

Television: British Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the British television task force (assessed as Low-importance).

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Current article states there was a 1960 NORTH KOREAN TV version.

I don't think they had TV in North Korea in 1960. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.134.234.96 (talk) 02:01, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:The Citadel BBC.jpg

Image:The Citadel BBC.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 06:20, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rationale added to image article. Johnmc (talk) 13:18, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 14 July 2018

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Withdrawing request. Gonnym (talk) 20:03, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

– Per WP:NCTV, the UK version should be prefixed by both year and country as there is already another UK version The Citadel (1960 UK miniseries) and a few others from other countries. The Italian version at first thought, should be changed to The Citadel (Italian miniseries) as there is not another article called "The Citadel" about an Italian miniseries, however La Cittadella (1964 miniseries) exists which is using A) the same Italian name as the 2003 miniseries and B) is based on the same novel. So either way, the Italian version should either be changed to The Citadel (2003 Italian miniseries) or The Citadel (Italian miniseries). Gonnym (talk) 17:59, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Again, no: strong oppose – you obviously are confused on how this is supposed to work: you disambiguate "by year only" when that is all that is necessary to disambiguate two titles – as it is here. If you want to create redirects at the proposed titles, go ahead. But these articles should not be moved! (See: The Citadel#Arts, media, and entertainment for the complete listing...) --IJBall (contribs • talk) 18:33, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If I would know how to, I would withdraw my move request based on the conversation in the other article. --Gonnym (talk) 21:10, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Eh, it's OK – worst thing that happens is this stays open for a week. No harm done. But it looks like there's no "formal process" for a nominator to "withdraw" a WP:RM, from what I can tell. P.S. There's nothing wrong with creating redirects at the suggested titles, as per Redirects are cheap... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 21:21, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Gonnym: Apparently, this is how you "withdraw" a WP:RM – you declare you're withdrawing, and then use {{RM top}} and {{RM bottom}} to close. Just so you (we!) know! --IJBall (contribs • talk) 15:37, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.