Jump to content

Talk:Thalassodrominae

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move 7 March 2021

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: page moved. (closed by non-admin page mover)Nnadigoodluck 08:07, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]



ThalassodromidaeThalassodrominae – Main thing here is the naming priority, Thalassodrominae was named first. Another thing is that Thalassodrominae is used more frequently, so changing the name is more practical. JurassicClassic767 (talk | contribs) 15:13, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support - Since both names are used within the article, even though Thalassodrominae was named first, I support this decision. Saves a lot of confusion, as well as being more accurate. Borophagus (talk) 10:40, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I'm going to need some citations on Thalassodrominae being used "more frequently" than it as its own family. LittleLazyLass (Talk | Contributions) 14:17, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, here[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10] are some examples of studies using "Thalassodrominae" (the two last ones don't label Thalassodrominae, but it's clear that both Thalassodromeus and Tupuxuara are recovered within the Tapejaridae), while here[11][12][13][14] are some recent studies using "Thalassodromidae" as far as I know. JurassicClassic767 (talk | contribs) 20:28, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@LittleLazyLass: Added several studies above, which use either Thalassodrominae or Thalassodromidae. JurassicClassic767 (talk | contribs) 07:47, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.