A fact from Tetracentron hopkinsii appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 19 August 2020 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
... that the Eocene leaf species Tetracentron hopkinsii(pictured) wasn't confirmed from Washington State until 2018? Source:Manchester et al 2018: "However, additional specimens have confirmed the presence of this species at Republic")
Is the DYK text incomplete or missing something? Or perhaps it's using niche jargon? I'm struggling to understand what "was not confirmed from Washington state" is supposed to mean. Vadim Galimov (talk) 09:12, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
As stated in the article, leaves resembling T. hopkinsii were tentatively identified in 2007, but it wasn't until further fossils had been recovered that researched confirmed the Washington State fossils were of the same species as the British Columbia fossils.--Kevmin§15:58, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]