Talk:Temple Block

This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.DisambiguationWikipedia:WikiProject DisambiguationTemplate:WikiProject DisambiguationDisambiguation articles

Latter Day Saint movement

This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Latter Day Saint movement, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mormonism and the Latter Day Saint movement on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Latter Day Saint movementWikipedia:WikiProject Latter Day Saint movementTemplate:WikiProject Latter Day Saint movementLatter Day Saint movement articles

Requested move 6 November 2020

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved -- JHunterJ (talk) 12:41, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temple Block → Temple Block (disambiguation) – Temple Block had been a redirect to Temple Square for 10+ years. It is now a dab with two (Temple Block)s and two (Temple Square)s. Pageviews show Temple Square, the church complex in Salt Lake City gets 10x the views of the other articles so it would be a PT if it had the same name. But block ≠ square. Googling "Temple block" or "Temple Block" shows the instrument, Temple block, is most likely what this means. Temple block is actually a redirect to wooden fish.

I think Temple Block should be a alternate capitalization redirect to Temple block as what the reader is most likely trying to find, in spite of the capitalization match with Temple Block (Los Angeles). There is probably no good reason to even keep the dab as there are really no articles of the same name that need disambiguation. MB 00:13, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Requested move 19 November 2020

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved. (non-admin closure) Simplexity22 (talk) 15:12, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temple Block (disambiguation) → Temple Block – Temple Block has three possible meanings. It needs to be the disambiguation page. It should not automatically transfer users to a page about wooden fishes Keizers (talk) 01:45, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom.--Ortizesp (talk) 15:04, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and use hatnotes for disambiguation. I can only see 2 uses. Temple block (lower case) redirects to Wooden fish which has a hatnote. Change that hatnote to {{redirect|Temple block|the place|Victorian Downtown Los Angeles#Temple Block}}. Temple Block (upper case) should be retargeted to Victorian Downtown Los Angeles#Temple Block with a hatnote {{redirect|Temple Block|the percussion instrument|Wooden fish}}. Delete Temple Block (disambiguation). Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 08:16, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nomination. No Wikipedia article bears the main title header, "Temple block", since all such-named titles are redirects. Thus it is counterintuitive to have a disambiguation page with one WP:PRIMARYREDIRECT, WP:ONEOTHER entry and two "See also" entries. I would also support the above proposal by Shhhnotsoloud if consensus skews in that direction. —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 08:26, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.