Talk:Tees Valley Metro

Trains: in UK Mid‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as Mid-importance).

An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Yorkshire Low‑importance

	Yorkshire portal Tees Valley Metro is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

North East England

	North East England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject North East England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of North East England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.North East EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject North East EnglandTemplate:WikiProject North East EnglandNorth East England
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Removal of the comment about it being 'spun'

Hi, While I agree with the sentiment that certain elements are spining how the final system will turn out, I cannot find any citable sources (only blog comments). Therefore, unless anyone can provide a link I'll remove the section and rely on a accurate portayal of the outcomes from each stage to give people a clear picture what the system will poentially be. --NicholasAdams (talk) 20:54, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Also re the new line not serving wilton this is actually not true as the Draft Business Case from April this year (2009) mentions Wilton. From the map that Tees Valley Regeneration made they clearly concidered it. I'm thinking that prehaps they mean to move British Steel Redcar Station to closer to Wilton. --NicholasAdams (talk) 21:12, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

23rd July 2009

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/8164411.stm Andrew Duffell (talk) 11:19, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Edits by 129.11.76.229

Can I just ask ppl's opinions on the edits made by 129.11.76.229. Apart from the addition of the word station in regards to Teesside Airport the other edits make the section less legible to me, and interrupt the flow of the list of improvements. NicholasAdams (talk) 17:44, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Guisborough

Given the short distance between Nunthorpe and Guisborough I really don't see an extension of Route 2 to Guisborough hasn't been considered instead of having a Nunthorpe Parkway station. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.159.12.172 (talk) 22:21, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Route diagram

Tees Valley Metro

Proposed Routes

north

1

Darlington

East Coast Main Line

south

Durham Coast Line

to Newcastle

1b Morton Palms

Hartlepool

2

Dinsdale

Seaton Carew

1a

Durham Tees Valley Airport

Relocated Teesside Airport

Queens Meadow

2

Allens West

Billingham

Eaglescliffe

Stockton

Thornaby

Teesside Park 1a

Middlesbrough

1

James Cook

University Hospital

Middlehaven 1b

Marton

South Bank

Gypsy Lane

Wilton

Possibly relocated

British Steel Redcar

1a

Nunthorpe

Redcar Central

2 2

Nunthorpe Parkway

Redcar East

The Ings 2

Longbeck

Marske

Saltburn 1

Key

Route number 0

0 Stage number

I'm not sure which is better: the two existing diagrams in the article, or this new combined one. Useddenim (talk) 19:21, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Tees Valley Metro. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110721121923/http://www.teesvalleyunlimited.gov.uk/documents/mins/transport220707notes.pdf to http://www.teesvalleyunlimited.gov.uk/documents/mins/transport220707notes.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 11:08, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]