Talk:Tectonic evolution of the Aravalli Mountains

A fact from Tectonic evolution of the Aravalli Mountains appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 26 December 2016 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the Aravalli Mountains contain intensely deformed rocks?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2016/December. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Tectonic evolution of the Aravalli Mountains.

Wikipedia

Asia

	Asia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Asia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Asia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject AsiaTemplate:WikiProject AsiaAsia articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article was created or improved during WikiProject Asia's "Asian 10,000 Challenge", which started in October 2016 and is still continuing. You can help!

Geology Low‑importance

	Geology portal Talk:Tectonic evolution of the Aravalli Mountains is part of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

India: Delhi / Gujarat / Haryana / Rajasthan Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Delhi.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Gujarat.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Haryana.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Rajasthan.
	This article was last assessed in August 2017.

Mountains Low‑importance

	Mountains portal This article is part of WikiProject Mountains, a project to systematically present information on mountains. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (see Contributing FAQ for more information), or visit the project page where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MountainsWikipedia:WikiProject MountainsTemplate:WikiProject MountainsMountain articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was the subject of an educational assignment in Fall Semester 2016. Further details were available on the "Education Program:University of Hong Kong/Regional Geology (Fall Semester 2016)" page, which is now unavailable on the wiki.

3 suggestions

Hey, the 3 suggestions I have are:

First Image located under the title
Table of contents locate under the title
For your own image, please be more careful and make it more realistic.

Perry

Review from Christy

Hello Roberta! Here are some suggestions for your page ;)

1.The photo of named The Aravalli Mountain Range should be put under the title and content.

2. The GIF of the evolution Aravalli and Delhi orogenies is a bit too fast which readers cannot get all the information clearly. You may make it slower and add number to each steps at the corner of your GIF so readers could know the order of each picture in the GIF.

3. You may add more annotations to your images in the GIF to make it clearer. For example the yellow and purple shapes appeared between the two cratons.

4. You may separate the evolution disgram of Aravalli and Delhi orogenies into two GIF, as they are two distinct episodes. It might be easier for readers to understand.

Christy Christyyc (talk) 18:27, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Peer review from Ron

Dear Roberta,

Nice work, here are few suggestions which you may consider:

A geological map can be shown to illustrate the subdivision of the Indian Shield.
I think a section called "Settings of Indian Shield" can be added, where you can introduce the Indian Shield briefly. The page you linked is not that informative.
There are few areas that are not well cited. For example: the last sentence of the first paragraph of Delhi Orogeny.

Cheers, Ron

Review from Jup :DDD

Here are some minor suggestions for your page:

1. For the part "Geology of the Aravalli Mountains", you may want to make a very simple stratigraphic column of groups, sub-group formations and the time of event. It may help your readers to understand the flow of geological history in a few second by the diagram before reading the detailed text.

2. For the diagram "Columbia supercontinent", "Rodinia supercontinent" and "Gondwana supercontinent, you may want to enlarge the size, as it is too small and very different to read (on desktop screen).

3. You have mentioned about different rock types in your page. You may want to add links to the related wiki pages, so the reader can find out more about it!

jupmira104 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 18:37, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Review from Jenny

1. In the section of ‘Four phases of tectonic evolution’, should the sub-titles match with the four phases listed at the beginning?

2. You may add more explanation on why the orogeny evolution has changed from rifting to subducting repeatedly. The graphics are well-made though!

3. It looks like diagram (3) and (4) are focusing on different locations nearby, it may be clearer to state where is (4) relative to (3).

Good job!

Manngaa Jenny (talk) 19:38, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Review from Lydiaa

The evolutions diagrams look pretty, but I think you can add more image description, especially how rifting change to subduction. And they are of six stages, why don't you separately introduce each stage?

The last part about supercontinent is interesting, but can you make th map bigger?

The geological map labels doesn't help readers to understand your text, ,maybe you can categorise in a new way?

Lydia yip (talk) 05:39, 23 November 2016 (UTC) Lydia yip (talk) 05:39, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please help with enhancements

Dear all,
Thanks for contributing to the Tectonic evolution of the Aravalli Mountains. I am not a geologist and I am learning as I go along, I wrote the similar section on Aravalli's geology from a layman's perspective with descriptions in brackets, etc. Please help by reviewing and enhancing/editing my work here >>> Aravalli Range Geology. Thanks.
2404:E800:E61E:452:80B7:878A:66AC:F49E (talk) 17:43, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]