Jump to content

Talk:Tallink

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Lap of Luxury

[edit]

I'm not opposing the removal of the possible name Luxury from NB 1361, but I have to point out it wasn't entirely speculative as "Luxury" was the winner in a naming competition Tallink held for the ship in Finland last autumn. - Kjet 22:58, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dear People, The question of this History of many Boats and Ships instead of one the Gerog Ots would be if there would be also name Tallink Ship named Victoria on Finnish Estonian Shipline and how much metal could be used for producing household articles as waschmaschines and electrical Owens and stoves e.t.c. from scrapping those Tallink old went boats and ships in Estland. Additional workplaces would be fine. As independent country Shipping Company we can provide the food and other products to Finland and having business transactions between two countries. I consider Telia Sonera taking over Finland Telecommunication Elisa if it is truth little bit not considered from our Finnish Neighbours. It is something to do with hearing in other people phones and homes through eavesdropping devices and knowing their personal addresses. Luxury word in Estonia could stay with farming to themselves as they always did during this half century. For many of us this word is useless.
Plastic Forks and Knives could be nice to have in Burger King. Hopefully we do have also estonian children and grandchildren to lead this heritage forward as why and to who we did all this hard work. Does the food and heat price in skandinavia impacts our childrens future. We estonians should remember who we are and where we live. Sincerely the daughter of ship engineer & constructor. 2A00:D4A0:5:F000:1C66:32A3:B0F1:A8E5 (talk) 04:03, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Enn Pant

[edit]

Is Enn Pant a man or a woman? The article doesn't mention that. If he/she were a Finn or a Swede, I'd figure it out from the first name, but "Enn" doesn't mean anything to me. JIP | Talk 19:21, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

He's a man. The section should probably be reworded to make this clear, but at least I can't think of an elegant way to do it. - Kjet 20:43, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Tallink.jpg

[edit]

Image:Tallink.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:25, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject class rating

[edit]

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 16:15, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]