Talk:Symmetric function
Appearance
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
Do we really need this article?
[edit]I've tried to shape up this article a bit, but I do get the impression that there is very little of interest in this article. For a function that is symmetric in its n arguments but has no other known properties, one can say that it, um..., is symmetric. For the rest it seems that all interesting stuff is in other articles, and this one neither provides an interesting (or even comprehensible) summary, common point of view, or anything new. Marc van Leeuwen (talk) 10:15, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
Too technical (03/03/2013)
[edit]Im not sure what an argument is, and there is no hyperlink? Bg9989 (talk) 22:40, 3 March 2013 (UTC)